Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM64017
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
MBA
RATHINAM TECHNICAL CAMPUS
MBA
RATHINAM TECHNICAL CAMPUS
Psychological safety has emerged as a critical factor influencing employee behavior, workplace relationships, and organizational success in modern business environments. The present study examines the role of psychological safety and its impact on employee performance and innovation within organizations. Psychological safety refers to a workplace environment where employees feel comfortable expressing ideas, asking questions, sharing feedback, and admitting mistakes without fear of criticism or negative consequences. The study focuses on understanding how supportive leadership, open communication, teamwork, and organizational culture contribute to creating psychologically safe workplaces. Primary data for the study was collected through a structured questionnaire from employees working in an organization, while secondary data was obtained from journals, books, and research articles. The findings reveal that psychological safety positively influences employee confidence, communication, collaboration, creativity, and productivity. Employees working in psychologically safe environments are more likely to participate actively in discussions, share innovative ideas, and contribute effectively to organizational goals. The study also highlights the role of leadership and organizational support in fostering trust and openness among employees. The research concludes that psychological safety is essential for enhancing employee engagement, innovation, and overall organizational performance. Organizations that prioritize psychological safety can improve employee satisfaction, strengthen teamwork, and achieve long-term business success in highly competitive environments.
KEYWORDS
Psychological safety has become an essential element of organizational success in modern workplaces. The present study examined the impact of psychological safety on employee performance and innovation and identified its importance in creating supportive and productive work environments. The findings reveal that employees working in psychologically safe environments demonstrate higher confidence, engagement, communication, teamwork, and creativity. Psychological safety encourages employees to express ideas openly, participate in discussions, and contribute innovative solutions without fear of criticism. The study also highlights the important role of leadership, communication practices, and organizational culture in shaping employee perceptions and workplace experiences. Supportive leadership and transparent communication strengthen trust and improve employee motivation and productivity. Organizations that prioritize psychological safety are more likely to achieve long-term success through improved employee engagement, stronger collaboration, and continuous innovation. Therefore, organizations should focus on building inclusive workplace cultures that support openness, learning, and employee well-being. Overall, psychological safety is not only beneficial for employees but also essential for organizational growth, adaptability, and competitiveness in today’s dynamic business environment.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 45–68. Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869–884. Edmondson, A., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 23–43. Frazier, M. L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R. L., Pezeshkan, A., & Vracheva, V. (2017). Psychological safety: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 113–165. Newman, A., Donohue, R., & Eva, N. (2017). Psychological safety: A systematic review. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 521–535. Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee creativity. Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 250–260. Liang, J., Farh, C. I., & Farh, J. L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71–92. Google Project Aristotle. (2015). Understanding team effectiveness and psychological safety in organizations.
Publication Date
5/26/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...