Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM67714

A Study on Risk–Return Evaluation of Indian Mutual Funds: A Comparative Secondary Data Analysis of Equity, Debt, and Hybrid Categories

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM67714

Volume:

10 |

10 |

Oct 2026

Pages:

1-12

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM67714

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Patel Archi Vinodkumar

Patel Archi Vinodkumar

Faculty of Management Studies, Department of Business Management,

Sankalchand Patel University, Visnagar

Download Author Certificate
Suthar Urchita Dilipkumar

Suthar Urchita Dilipkumar

Faculty of Management Studies, Department of Business Management,

Sankalchand Patel University, Visnagar

Download Co-Author Certificate
Dr. Chhaya Patel

Dr. Chhaya Patel

Faculty of Management Studies, Department of Business Management,

Sankalchand Patel University, Visnagar

Download Co-Author Certificate

Mentors

Dr. Chhaya Patel

Dr. Chhaya Patel

Faculty of Management Studies, Department of Business Management,

Sankalchand Patel University, Visnagar

Download Mentor Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

The Indian financial market has witnessed substantial transformation over the past two decades, with mutual funds emerging as a preferred investment avenue for retail and institutional investors. Mutual funds provide diversification, liquidity, and professional fund management, making them suitable for individuals with varying risk appetites and financial objectives. The industry’s growth has been supported by rising financial literacy, digital platforms, increasing disposable incomes, and regulatory initiatives by SEBI and AMFI, leading to a significant increase in Assets Under Management (AUM). This study undertakes a comparative secondary data analysis of equity, debt, and hybrid mutual fund categories in India to evaluate their risk–return dynamics. Equity funds are characterized by high return potential but greater volatility, debt funds emphasize stability and predictable income, while hybrid funds balance risk and reward by combining equity and debt components. The analysis also considers the impact of macroeconomic variables such as inflation, interest rates, and market volatility, alongside policy measures including taxation reforms introduced in the Union Budget 2024–26, which notably altered the tax treatment of debt mutual funds. The findings of this research aim to provide insights into the relative performance of mutual fund categories, enabling investors, fund managers, and policymakers to make informed decisions. By systematically evaluating risk-adjusted returns and category-specific characteristics, the study contributes to the broader literature on mutual fund performance and offers practical guidance for navigating India’s evolving financial landscape.

KEYWORDS

Risk–Return Analysis Equity Funds Debt Funds Hybrid Funds.

Cite This Article

Patel Archi Vinodkumar, Suthar Urchita Dilipkumar, Dr. Chhaya Patel, Dr. Chhaya Patel, "A Study on Risk–Return Evaluation of Indian Mutual Funds: A Comparative Secondary Data Analysis of Equity, Debt, and Hybrid Categories," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1-12, Oct 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM67714

Full Article/Conclusion

The evaluation of mutual funds in India demonstrates the dynamic interplay between risk–return characteristics, macroeconomic conditions, and regulatory reforms. Equity funds continue to be the most effective vehicle for long-term wealth creation, offering high returns but accompanied by significant volatility. Debt funds, while traditionally valued for stability and tax efficiency, have lost some attractiveness following the Union Budget 2026–27 reforms that removed indexation benefits. Hybrid funds emerge as a balanced alternative, appealing to moderate-risk investors by combining equity growth with debt stability. The findings highlight that mutual fund performance is not solely determined by market forces but is also shaped by fiscal policies, taxation structures, and investor sentiment. This underscores the importance of aligning investment decisions with both risk appetite and the evolving policy environment. From a research perspective, this study bridges critical gaps by providing a comparative secondary data analysis of equity, debt, and hybrid funds in the Indian context, integrating risk–return metrics with macroeconomic and policy variables. The insights generated are valuable for investors seeking optimal fund selection, fund managers designing competitive products, and policymakers aiming to sustain investor confidence in the mutual fund industry.

References

1. Maheswari, R. (2020). Comparative performance analysis of equity, debt, and hybrid mutual funds in India. International Journal of Management Studies, 7(3), 88–96. 2. variables on mutual fund performance in India. Journal of Commerce and Accounting Research, 9(1), 21–30. 3. Virparia, H. (2022). Risk and return analysis of selected mutual funds in India. Asian Journal of Management Research, 12(2), 101–110. 4. Begum, S., & Vepa, K. (2022). Performance evaluation of mutual funds in India using risk-adjusted measures. International Journal of Financial Research, 13(4), 45–56. 5. Chaudhari, P., & Meman, S. (2025). Comparative analysis of debt and equity mutual funds in India. Indian Journal of Finance and Banking, 9(2), 112–126. 6. Rao, V., & Verma, A. (2021). Investor perception towards hybrid mutual funds in India. Journal of Financial Services Research, 13(2), 101–115. 7. Kumar, S., & Reddy, P. (2024). Trends in hybrid mutual fund investments in India. International Journal of Financial Research, 15(2), 56–69. 8. Gupta, L. C. (2020). Mutual funds and asset allocation. New Delhi, India: Tata McGraw-Hill Education. 9. Bhole, L. M., & Mahakud, J. (2021). Financial institutions and markets (6th ed.). New Delhi, India: Tata McGrawHill Education. 10. Reilly, F. K., Brown, K. C., & Leeds, S. (2022). Investment analysis and portfolio management (13th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

10/7/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

3

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

17

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...