Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM67955

A Study on the Impact of Financial Market Uncertainty on Gold as a Protective Investment

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM67955

Volume:

10 |

10 |

Oct 2026

Pages:

1-13

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM67955

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

BL

Banala Lohith

Bachelor of Business Administration.

kl university

Download Author Certificate
DV

Dr. V.Narendra

Bachelor of Business Administration.

kl university

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Purpose. This research paper explores how people react to financial-market uncertainty, how they perceive the effect of financial-market uncertainty on the price of gold and on the returns on gold, whether they view gold as a protective (safe haven) investment and whether they believe that gold behaves differently during times of high and low uncertainty. Design. A quantitative, cross sectional survey was carried out in which a structured questionnaire comprised of 20 five point Likert items was included in four constructs. A convenience sampling was used to distribute 400 questionnaires and retain 98 questionnaires that were usable. Descriptive statistics, Cronbach's alpha, one-sample t-test, Pearson correlation, chi-square test of independence, one-way ANOVA, simple and multiple linear regression were used for data analysis in Microsoft Excel. Findings. The mean for each of the four propositions—uncertainty affects gold prices (M = 3.78); uncertainty is related to gold returns (M = 3.53); uncertainty makes gold a safe-haven investment (M = 3.45); and uncertainty improves gold's relative performance in high-uncertainty periods (M = 3.57)—was significantly higher than the neutral value of 3 for each of the tests, with p < .001. However, none of the constructs were significantly related to each other (all regression models; p > .05; R² ranged from .001 to .054), group differences in ANOVA were non-significant except one that did not pass correction for multiple testing (p > .05; R² = .30), and internal consistency of the scales was low (α ranged from -0.18 to .30). The age group, stream of study and occupation were found to be associated with the prior investment in gold investing using chi-square tests whereas gender was not found to be associated with the prior investment in gold investing. Implications and limitations. Though perceptions have been strongly skewed toward gold as a protective asset, these are attitudinal perceptions based on a small convenience sample of mostly young engineering students, and not based on actual price behavior. Originality. The study provides evidence of individual-investor perception of India which complements the secondary market evidence in the literature.

KEYWORDS

: Gold Safe Haven Asset Financial-market uncertainty Investor perception Gold returns Portfolio protection India.

Cite This Article

Banala Lohith, Dr. V.Narendra, "A Study on the Impact of Financial Market Uncertainty on Gold as a Protective Investment," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1-13, Oct 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM67955

Full Article/Conclusion

Respondents perceive financial-market uncertainty as a significant driver of gold prices and returns, regard gold as a safe-haven investment, and believe it performs better when uncertainty is high; all four null hypotheses were rejected on the basis of the one-sample tests against the neutral value (p < .001). However, these perceptions were not statistically linked to each other in regression or correlation analysis, differed little across demographic groups, and were not associated with prior investment in gold. Prior investment was associated with age, income, stream and occupation. The evidence therefore supports the view that gold enjoys a strong reputation as a protective asset among the respondents, while it does not establish that this reputation is grounded in a coherent, structured belief system or in actual price behaviour.

References

1. Akhtaruzzaman, M., Boubaker, S., Lucey, B. M., & Sensoy, A. (2021). Is gold a hedge or a safe-haven asset in the COVID–19 crisis? Economic Modelling, 102, Article 105588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105588 2. Arslanalp, S., Eichengreen, B., & Simpson-Bell, C. (2023). Gold as international reserves: A barbarous relic no more? (IMF Working Paper No. WP/23/14). International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2023.103822 3. Baronyan, S. R., & Nae, A. (2025). Gold in a fragmented world: Safe haven and strategic asset. FTSE Russell / London Stock Exchange Group, Global Investment Research. https://www.lseg.com/en/ftse-russell/research 4. Baur, D. G. (2021). Is gold a safe haven in all currencies? [Working paper]. University of Western Australia. https://www.ssrn.com 5. Baur, D. G., & Dimpfl, T. (2023). How to use gold as a safe haven [Working paper]. University of Western Australia / University of Hohenheim. https://www.ssrn.com 6. Baur, D. G., & Lucey, B. M. (2010). Is gold a hedge or a safe haven? An analysis of stocks, bonds and gold. The Financial Review, 45(2), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.2010.00244.x 7. Baur, D. G., & McDermott, T. K. (2010). Is gold a safe haven? International evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(8), 1886–1898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.12.008 8. Baur, D. G., & Smales, L. (2018). Gold and geopolitical risk [Working paper]. University of Western Australia Business School / Curtin University Business School. https://www.ssrn.com 9. Ben Ameur, H., Jamaani, F., & Abu Alfoul, M. N. (2024). Examining the safe-haven and hedge capabilities of gold and cryptocurrencies: A GARCH and regression quantiles approach in geopolitical and market extremes. Heliyon, 10(21), Article e40400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40400 10. Bhunia, A., & Das, A. (2025). Safe haven or risky bet? A study of gold prices during Indian stock market volatility. Economy, 12(2), 175–181. https://www.asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/Economy

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

10/15/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

1

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

6

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...