Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM34245
Volume:
8 |
5 |
May 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Diabetes is a serious, long-lasting illness that makes blood sugar levels high. It can lead to many health problems. By 2040, it’s expected that 1 in 10 adults worldwide will have diabetes, reaching a staggering 642 million people. This is a big concern and needs attention. Scientists are using advanced technology like machine learning to predict diabetes. They studied data from hospital check-ups in Luzhou, China, which had 14 pieces of information about each person. They used two different methods like decision trees, random forests to make predictions. They tested these methods to see how well they worked, using a technique called five-fold cross-validation. To make sure their findings were reliable; they also did separate tests with a large group of healthy people and those with diabetes. Because the data wasn’t evenly balanced between healthy and diabetic people, they adjusted it to make it fair. They found that random forests were the best at predicting diabetes accurately, with about 81% accuracy when using all the information available. They also used techniques like principal component analysis and minimum redundancy maximum relevance to make the data easier to work with.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/31/45430
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...