Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM63330

A Survey on Unified Phishing and Email Spam Detection Systems Using Machine Learning and NLP

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM63330

Volume:

10 |

5 |

May 2026

Pages:

1-9

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM63330

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Sumanth Mohan

Sumanth Mohan

Department of Computer Science Engineering

Malnad College of Engineering

Download Author Certificate
Jeevan Y R

Jeevan Y R

Department of Computer Science Engineering

Malnad College of Engineering

Download Co-Author Certificate
Tejaswi B N

Tejaswi B N

Department of Computer Science Engineering

Malnad College of Engineering

Download Co-Author Certificate
Ritish Sharma

Ritish Sharma

Department of Computer Science

Malnad College of Engineering

Download Co-Author Certificate

Mentors

Keerti K S

Keerti K S

Department of Computer Science Engineering

Malnad College of Engineering

Download Mentor Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Phishing websites and email spam have become two of the most persistent and damaging cyber threats facing users and organisations today. What makes modern attacks particularly difficult to handle is that they rarely rely on a single trick — attackers routinely combine deceptive URLs, social engineering, fake branding, and crafted email content all at once, making it easy to slip past conventional security tools. Systems built around rigid rule-based filters simply cannot keep up with how quickly these tactics evolve. Over the past several years, machine learning, natural language processing (NLP), deep learning, and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) have opened up much more effective paths forward. This survey reviews existing approaches to phishing URL detection, spam classification, feature engineering, ensemble methods, semantic analysis, visual similarity detection, and real-time threat intelligence. We examine algorithms ranging from Naive Bayes and SVM through to gradient boosting and deep learning models. We also identify a persistent gap: most systems treat phishing detection and spam filtering as entirely separate problems. This survey argues that a unified pipeline enriched with LLM-based explainability and live threat intelligence feeds is the most promising direction for next-generation cybersecurity systems.

KEYWORDS

Keywords—Phishing Detection Spam Email Classification Machine Learning NLP Explainable AI Random Forest XGBoost SVM Naive Bayes Cybersecurity Threat Intelligence.

Cite This Article

Sumanth Mohan, Jeevan Y R, Tejaswi B N, Ritish Sharma, Keerti K S, "A Survey on Unified Phishing and Email Spam Detection Systems Using Machine Learning and NLP," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1-9, May 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM63330

Full Article/Conclusion

Phishing and spam are not going away. If anything, the tools available to attackers are becoming more sophisticated — generative AI has already made it easier to craft convincing, personalised phishing messages at scale, and LLM-assisted attacks can now dynamically tailor content to individual targets based on publicly available social data. The research community's response needs to match that sophistication. This survey traced the evolution of detection techniques from simple Bayesian filters through ensemble machine learning and into NLP-enriched and deep learning approaches. Algorithms including SVM [22], Naive Bayes, Random Forest [21], Logistic Regression, and XGBoost [23] each contribute something distinct, and the strongest systems today combine several of them. NLP tools — TF-IDF [17], word embeddings [24], and contextual models like BERT [6] — have transformed what it means to analyse email and webpage content. We reviewed 17 representative works spanning URL detection, email classification, semantic analysis, ensemble methods, and survey studies, summarised in Table 1. What this survey keeps returning to is the gap between individual technical advances and systems that actually work together. Isolated architectures, unexplainable decisions, and blind spots for zero-day threats [19] are the gaps that real attackers slip through. Unified frameworks that connect phishing detection to email classification, explain their reasoning in plain language, and stay current through live threat intelligence APIs [27, 28] represent the direction the field needs to move in. The building blocks are fully available — what is needed now is the architectural vision to assemble them into a coherent whole.

References

[1] C. Anilkumar, A. Karrothu, N. Sri Mouli, and C. Bhanu Tej, "Recognition and Processing of Phishing Emails Using NLP: A Survey," in Proc. Int. Conf. Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI), 2023. [2] A. R. More, O. B. Shendkar, K. G. Pathak, P. D. Sanap, S. N. Pachore, and P. William, "Survey on Framework for Governing Modern Cyber Attacks in Computer Network," in Proc. ICCAKM, 2023. [3] A. Jain and B. Gupta, "A Machine Learning Based Approach for Phishing Detection Using Hyperlinks Information," Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 2015–2028, 2019. [4] A. Blum, B. Wardman, T. Solorio, and G. Warner, "Lexical Feature Based Phishing URL Detection Using Online Learning," in Proc. ACM Workshop on AI and Security, pp. 54–60, 2010. [5] S. Garera, N. Provos, M. Chew, and A. Rubin, "A Framework for Detection and Measurement of Phishing Attacks," in Proc. ACM Workshop on Recurring Malcode, pp. 1–8, 2007. [6] J. Devlin, M. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, "BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding," in Proc. NAACL, 2019. [7] P. Verma, V. Goyal, and Y. Verdhan, "Phishing Website Detection Using Neural Network and Deep Learning," International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 176, no. 39, pp. 1–6, 2020. [8] I. Fette, N. Sadeh, and A. Tomasic, "Learning to Detect Phishing Emails," in Proc. Int. Conf. World Wide Web, pp. 649–656, 2007. [9] J. Ma, L. Saul, S. Savage, and G. Voelker, "Beyond Blacklists: Learning to Detect Malicious Web Sites from Suspicious URLs," in Proc. ACM SIGKDD, pp. 1245–1254, 2009. [10] T. Peng, I. Harris, and Y. Sawa, "Detecting Phishing Attacks Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning," in Proc. IEEE 12th Int. Conf. Semantic Computing (ICSC), 2018.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

5/16/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

3

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...