Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM55072
Volume:
9 |
12 |
Dec 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This paper presents a quantitative analysis of the Academic and Administrative Audit (AAA) system conducted in 40 Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) located in Pune, India, drawing upon primary data collected from 1104 stakeholders, including teaching staff, students, and administrative personnel. The research establishes that while HEIs in the region demonstrate structural maturity through high rates of compliance and strong academic quality assurance processes, this efficacy is simultaneously undermined by pervasive organizational friction. Key findings indicate a strong endorsement of AAA for its ability to enhance strategic planning and core academic delivery, achieving high reported implementation rates. However, this procedural success exists in tension with critical failures in non-academic support services (e.g., washroom maintenance, canteen hygiene), which receive significant stakeholder dissatisfaction. The study identifies staff resistance , lack of funds , and structural bureaucracy as the primary systemic barriers to achieving a robust, sustainable quality culture. The paper concludes by arguing that for AAA to transition from a mandatory compliance mechanism to a genuine driver of institutional transformation, policy revisions must mandate targeted investment in infrastructure and staff welfare, coupled with a deliberate shift toward decentralized, participatory administrative governance.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
10/11/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...