Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68326
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-7
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Computer Engineering
Sandip Institute of Technology and Research Centre Mahiravani Trimbak Road, Nashik – 422213, Maharashtra, India
Department of Computer Engineering
Sandip Institute of Technology and Research Centre Mahiravani Trimbak Road, Nashik – 422213, Maharashtra, India
Department of Computer Engineering
Sandip Institute of Technology and Research Centre Mahiravani Trimbak Road, Nashik – 422213, Maharashtra, India
Department of Computer Engineering
Sandip Institute of Technology and Research Centre Mahiravani Trimbak Road, Nashik – 422213, Maharashtra, India
Department of Computer Engineering
Sandip Institute of Technology and Research Centre Mahiravani Trimbak Road, Nashik – 422213, Maharashtra, India
Department of Computer Engineering
Sandip Institute of Technology and Research Centre Mahiravani Trimbak Road, Nashik – 422213, Maharashtra, India
Department of Computer Engineering
Sandip Institute of Technology and Research Centre Mahiravani Trimbak Road, Nashik – 422213, Maharashtra, India
Large Language Models have become integral to enterprise knowledge systems, yet their propensity to produce factually ungrounded outputs termed hallucinations remains a critical obstacle in regulated deployments. Retrieval Augmented Generation grounds model outputs in external knowledge, but conventional vector based pipelines exhibit severe limitations in multi hop reasoning and deterministic verification. While recent literature explores Graph based RAG and Agentic RAG as independent solutions, their isolated deployments fail to resolve the underlying tradeoffs between structural rigidity and non deterministic overhead. This paper presents a comprehensive literature review of the current RAG landscape, mapping the architectural evolution from static retrieval to dynamic multi agent orchestration. A rigorous comparative analysis evaluates these paradigms across retrieval adaptivity, multi hop capability, and hallucination mitigation. Through critical analysis, this work identifies persistent research gaps regarding graph construction noise, static retrieval policies, and the self correction paradox in LLMs. To address these limitations, this paper introduces a technically rigorous Proposed Framework: An Adaptive Agentic GraphRAG architecture. The proposed methodology leverages a LangGraph state machine to orchestrate planner and verifier agents across a hybrid vector graph backend, introducing extrinsic algorithmic verification to solve the self correction paradox. This paper serves as a theoretical foundation and architectural proposal intended for future experimental validation in enterprise environments.
KEYWORDS
This paper is an attempt to discuss the development process of RAG technology starting from static vector pipelines up to dynamic self corrective multi agent GraphRAGs. The analysis of literature proves that neither the improvement of graphs nor agents separately solves the problem of nondeterminism, extraction noise, and self correctivily of LLMs. To bridge these research gaps, this paper proposed the Adaptive Agentic GraphRAG framework. By integrating a hybrid vector graph retrieval backend with a state machine driven multi agent orchestrator, the proposed architecture dynamically routes queries to their optimal modality and enforces strict, algorithmic hallucination verification. The proposed framework is intended for future implementation and experimental validation. This paper establishes the theoretical foundation, literature analysis, and architectural design necessary to construct next generation, trustworthy enterprise AI systems capable of deep reasoning without sacrificing deterministic safety.
[1] A. Singh et al., ”Agentic Retrieval Augmented Generation: A Survey on Agentic RAG,” arXiv:2501.09136, Jan. 2025. [2] P. Patil et al., ”FinanceBench: A New Era to Evaluate Financial Context Aware Question Answering,” arXiv:2311.11944, 2023. [3] Y. Hu et al., ”RAGTruth: A Hallucination Corpus for Developing Trustworthy Retrieval Augmented Language Models,” Proc. ACL, pp. 1045-1060, 2024. [4] M. Jin et al., ”Search-R1: Reinforcement Learning for Agentic Retrieval Augmented Generation,” arXiv:2501.12154, 2025. [5] H. Alkaissi and S. I. McFarlane, ”Artificial Hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in Scientific Writing,” Cureus, vol. 15, no. 2, Feb. 2023. [6] S. M. Tonmoy et al., ”A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination Mitigation Techniques in Large Language Models,” arXiv:2401.01313, 2024. [7] P. Lewis et al., ”Retrieval Augmented Generation for Knowledge Intensive NLP Tasks,” NeurIPS, vol. 33, pp. 9459–9471, 2020. [8] D. Edge et al., ”From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query Focused Summarization,” arXiv:2404.16130, Apr. 2024. [9] S. Es et al., ”RAGAS: Automated Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generation,” arXiv:2309.15217, 2023. [10] S. Ji et al., ”A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition, and Applications,” IEEE Trans. Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 494–514, 2022.
Publication Date
10/26/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...