Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM36672
Volume:
8 |
7 |
Jul 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
In today’s software development world, quickly and accurately classifying bug reports is crucial for fixing issues on time and keeping software quality high. Bugs are a vital part of this process, carrying detailed information such as description, status, reporter, assignee, priority, severity, among others. It becomes tiresome and time-consuming to analyze these reports manually in search of all defects, especially when the size of these reports increases. Thus, automation is one of the best solutions. While current research is focused mainly on automating the identification of bug severity or priority, they often forget identification based on the nature of the bugs, which requires multi-class classification. A new prediction model has been used that analyzes BRs for the prediction of nature of the bugs. This model will combine the ensemble ML algorithm with NLP and ML techniques. In particular, the model is tested against publicly available datasets from Mozilla and Eclipse, which further categorize the bugs into six types: program anomaly, GUI, network or security, configuration, performance, and test-code. The results indicate that our model gave significantly higher accuracy compared to many pre-existing models without text augmentation, at 90.42 percent and with text augmentation at 96.72 percent.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
7/20/2024
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...