Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM33619
Volume:
8 |
6 |
Jun 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
In the aviation industry, safety remains vital, often compromised by pilot errors attributed to factors such as workload, fatigue, stress, and emotional disturbances. To address these challenges, recent research has increasingly leveraged psychophysiological data and machine learning techniques, offering the potential to enhance safety by understanding pilot behavior. This systematic literature review rigorously follows a widely accepted methodology, scrutinizing 80 peer-reviewed studies out of 3352 studies from five key electronic databases. The paper focuses on behavioral aspects, data types, preprocessing techniques, machine learning models, and performance metrics used in existing studies. It reveals that the majority of research disproportionately concentrates on workload and fatigue, leaving behavioral aspects like emotional responses and attention dynamics less explored. Machine learning models such as tree-based and support vector machines are most commonly employed, but the utilization of advanced techniques like deep learning remains limited. Traditional preprocessing techniques dominate the landscape, urging the need for advanced methods. Data imbalance and its impact on model performance is identified as a critical, underresearched area. The review uncovers significant methodological gaps, including the unexplored influence of preprocessing on model efficacy, lack of diversification in data collection environments, and limited focus on model explainability. The paper concludes by advocating for targeted future research to address these gaps, thereby promoting both methodological innovation and a more comprehensive understanding of pilot behavior.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
10/5/2024
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...