Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM11253
Volume:
5 |
12 |
Dec 2021
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This systematic literature review examines the integration of robotics in K-12 STEM education, focusing on assessment frameworks and inclusive teaching practices. Through analysis of empirical studies from 2006 to 2021, we identify key themes in educational robotics implementation, including technical skill development, cognitive growth, and social-emotional learning. The review synthesizes findings from 15 selected papers, highlighting the effectiveness of constructivist and constructionist approaches in robotics education. Particular attention is given to assessment methodologies that promote inclusive learning environments and support diverse student populations. The findings reveal that successful robotics integration requires comprehensive assessment frameworks that balance technical competency with broader educational outcomes. We present structured frameworks for evaluating student engagement, learning outcomes, and program effectiveness, while emphasizing the importance of adaptable teaching strategies that accommodate different learning styles and abilities. This review contributes to the growing body of knowledge on educational robotics by providing evidence-based recommendations for implementing inclusive, assessment-driven robotics programs in K-12 education.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/28/2021
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...