Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM62689
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-17
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

independent Researcher
University of the Potomac
This paper proposes AgentMesh-MCP, a secure and governed framework for agentic artificial intelligence systems that combine large language model agents with Model Context Protocol servers. Agentic AI systems increasingly reason over goals, decompose tasks, call tools, query private data, invoke APIs, and coordinate with other agents. The Model Context Protocol provides a standardized client-server mechanism for exposing tools, resources, and prompts to AI applications, but protocol-level interoperability alone does not solve authorization, prompt injection, tool poisoning, auditability, or unsafe autonomy. We formalize the agentic system as a constrained partially observable decision process in which agent state, environment state, tool state, policy state, and governance constraints evolve through MCP-mediated actions. The proposed framework introduces a policy and authorization gateway, context firewall, risk scoring engine, human approval gateway, execution monitor, immutable audit ledger, red-team module, evaluation engine, rollback layer, and governance dashboard. We synthesize evidence from LLM agent research, tool-use systems, prompt-injection studies, AI risk-management standards, and official MCP documentation to derive architectural requirements and evaluation criteria. The paper contributes a threat model, formal model, algorithms for policy-gated tool invocation and secure context filtering, comparative analysis, and a reproducible experimental testbed. The central finding is that production-grade agentic AI should be treated less as a chatbot extension and more as a distributed socio-technical system whose safety depends on least privilege, context isolation, observable execution, explicit human control points, and continuous governance.
KEYWORDS
Agentic AI systems will shape software engineering, cloud operations, enterprise automation, research, education, cybersecurity, legal work, healthcare administration, and many other domains. Their value comes from the ability to connect reasoning with action. Their risk comes from the same source. LLM agents that can use MCP servers are more interoperable and more capable, but they also create new failure modes involving prompt injection, tool poisoning, malicious servers, credential misuse, data leakage, excessive agency, memory poisoning, and multi-agent compromise. This paper proposed AgentMesh-MCP, a secure and governed framework for LLM agents and Model Context Protocol servers. The framework separates reasoning from execution, routes MCP calls through a policy and authorization gateway, filters context, scores risk, requires human approval for high-risk actions, monitors tool execution, records immutable audit events, supports rollback and recovery, and provides governance dashboards. It also formalized the system as a constrained transition process and supplied algorithms, evaluation metrics, experimental design, findings, use cases, limitations, and future research directions. The main conclusion is that production-grade agentic AI should be designed as governed distributed infrastructure, not as a more elaborate chatbot. MCP can become a powerful interoperability layer for AI systems, but secure deployment requires policy, identity, observability, and human control around the protocol. AgentMesh-MCP offers one path toward that goal. Its broader significance is that it treats autonomy as an engineering variable to be measured, constrained, and governed. If implemented carefully, secure MCP-mediated agents can transform digital work while preserving accountability and institutional control
[1] Anthropic, "Introducing the Model Context Protocol," Nov. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.anthropic.com/news/model-context-protocol [2] Model Context Protocol, "What is the Model Context Protocol (MCP)?" 2026. [Online]. Available: https://modelcontextprotocol.io/docs/getting-started/intro [3] Model Context Protocol, "Architecture overview," 2026. [Online]. Available: https://modelcontextprotocol.io/docs/learn/architecture [4] JSON-RPC Working Group, "JSON-RPC 2.0 Specification," 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification [5] S. Yao et al., "ReAct: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models," arXiv:2210.03629, 2022. [6] T. Schick et al., "Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools," arXiv:2302.04761, 2023. [7] N. Shinn et al., "Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning," arXiv:2303.11366, 2023. [8] G. Wang et al., "Voyager: An open-ended embodied agent with large language models," arXiv:2305.16291, 2023. [9] Q. Wu et al., "AutoGen: Enabling next-gen LLM applications via multi-agent conversation framework," arXiv:2308.08155, 2023. [10] J. S. Park et al., "Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior," in Proc. UIST, 2023.
Publication Date
5/6/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
10
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...