Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67480
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-7
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Information Technology And Computer Science
D. G. Ruparel College
Information Technology And Computer Science
D. G. Ruparel College
Digital platforms collect personal information for communication, shopping, financial transactions, entertainment, and personalized services. The same information can also be exposed through unauthorized access, excessive tracking, profiling, third-party sharing, or accidental disclosure. Conventional controls such as encryption and access management remain necessary, but they do not address every privacy concern when information is collected and processed continuously. This paper reviews how Artificial Intelligence (AI) can support personal-data privacy on digital platforms, with emphasis on machine learning, deep learning, federated learning, and differential privacy. The review considers their roles in identifying sensitive information, detecting unusual access, reducing centralized data exposure, and limiting individual-level disclosure. The reviewed literature also shows that these techniques are often discussed separately, while practical platforms need protection at several stages of the data lifecycle. To address this gap, this paper presents a conceptual framework linking data identification, sensitivity classification, privacy-risk assessment, protection selection, and continuous monitoring. The framework is intended as a practical basis for balancing privacy protection with data utility, scalability, computational cost, and user control. The paper further discusses implementation considerations, limitations, and future research directions for building more adaptive and privacy-aware digital platforms.
KEYWORDS
As digital platforms become more prevalent, the need to safeguard personal information during its collection, processing, storage and usage is increasing. While traditional security controls are still necessary, they don't address every privacy-related issue in large-scale, constantly evolving data environments. Additional capabilities of AI can be utilized to identify sensitive data, recognize unusual behavior or risks, and assist with privacy-protection processing. The papers explored various roles that machine learning, deep learning, and federated learning play in digital-platform privacy lifecycles, as well as their respective roles in different domains. The literature reviewed presented a conceptual framework that links data identification, sensitivity classification, privacy-risk assessment, protection selection, and continuous monitoring. This was done using the following methods: The framework stresses the importance of treating privacy as an ongoing process, rather than a single control applied at the end of data processing. Efforts on utility and computational cost can be influenced by greater privacy, while AI models may face additional privacy risks. The proposed structure does not assert that a single approach is adequate for all circumstances. It provides a methodical framework for choosing and combining methods that are appropriate for the risk, data type, and desired outcome. This approach can be advanced through future experimental validation, adaptive controls, privacy-preserving learning, and transparent AI-based privacy assistance.
[1] S. Yu, F. Carroll, and B. L. In IEEE Access, vol, Bentley provided insights into privacy protection research in AI. 12, 41704–41726, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3378126. [2] V. Morel, L. H. Iwaya, and S. In IEEE Access, Fischer-Hübner reviewed the literature on AI-Driven Privacy Assistants. 13, 160982–161002, 2025, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3609188. [3] E. Jahns, M. Stojkov, and M. A. Kinsy, "Privacy-Preserving Deep Learning: A Survey on Theoretical Foundation, Software Framework and Hardware Accelerators" IEEE Access, vol. 13, 67821–67855, 2025, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3561721. [4] C. Chronis, I. Varlamis, Y. Himeur, A. N. Sayed, T. M. Al-Hasan, A. Nhlabatsi, F. Bensaali, and G. In IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society, Dimitrakopoulos authored a paper on the application of Federated Learning to privacy-protecting reconstruction systems. 5, 227–247, 2024, doi: 10.1109/OJCS.2024.3396344. [5] M. Amiri, G. Quirchmayr, and E. "Using a Local Distance-Based Methodology to Introduce Differential Privacy for Recommender Systems," Weippl wrote in IEEE Access. vol. 44, Issue 1, Issue 2. 13, 161824– 161843, 2025, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3605563. [6] C. Dwork and A. Roth, "The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy," Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 9, no. 3–4, pp. 211– 407, 2014, doi: 10.1561/0400000042. [7] M. Abadi, A. Chu, I. Goodfellow, H. B. McMahan, I. Mironov, K. Talwar, and L. Zhang, "Deep Learning with Differential Privacy," in Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 308–318, 2016. [8] H. B. McMahan, E. Moore, D. Ramage, S. Hampson, and B. A. y Arcas, "Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data," in Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, vol. 54, pp. 1273–1282, 2017. [9] K. Bonawitz, V. Ivanov, B. Kreuter, A. Marcedone, H. B. McMahan, S. Patel, D. Ramage, A. Segal, and K. Seth, "Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning," in Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 1175–1191, 2017, doi: 10.1145/3133956.3133982. [10] R. Shokri, M. Stronati, C. Song, and V. Shmatikov, "Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Models," in 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 3–18, 2017, doi: 10.1109/SP.2017.41.
Publication Date
9/26/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...