Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM68453

AI-Based Prompt Optimizer, Evaluator & Multi-LLM Comparison Platform

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM68453

Volume:

10 |

10 |

Oct 2026

Pages:

1-4

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM68453

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

RS

Radhika SN

Computer Science and Engineering

Jawaharlal Nehru New College Of Engineering Shimoga

Download Author Certificate
AR

Archana R

Computer Science and Engineering

Jawaharlal Nehru New College Of Engineering Shimoga

Download Co-Author Certificate
Anvita R

Anvita R

Computer Science and Engineering

Jawaharlal Nehru New College Of Engineering Shimoga

Download Co-Author Certificate
ISN

Inchara S N

Computer Science and Engineering

Jawaharlal Nehru New College Of Engineering Shimoga

Download Co-Author Certificate
ACV

Arundhathi C V

Computer Science and Engineering

Jawaharlal Nehru New College Of Engineering Shimoga

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Writing effective prompts for large language models (LLMs) is still mostly manual trial and error, and judging how different providers answer the same prompt usually means pasting it into several chat windows with no shared, repeatable scoring. This paper describes a full-stack platform that automates both tasks. It first scores a prompt on ten deterministic, rule-based quality dimensions. It then rewrites the prompt over a configurable number of rounds using an LLM-driven strategy, re-scoring after each round. The final prompt is sent concurrently to OpenAI, Google Gemini, Anthropic Claude and Groq, with each provider isolated so that one failure cannot block the rest. Responses are evaluated using reference-based lexical metrics (ROUGE-L, BLEU, TF-IDF cosine similarity), multi-run consistency, a latency- and token-based efficiency score, and an LLM-as-a-judge component, merged into a weighted composite score. Every experiment, including per-round history and per-provider outputs, is stored in a relational database and shown on an interactive analytics dashboard with CSV/JSON export. The backend uses FastAPI and Python, the frontend uses React and TypeScript, and an automated test suite exercises the analyzer, evaluation metrics and REST API without needing live credentials. The result is a reproducible, explainable and extensible framework for comparing prompt-engineering strategies and LLM providers on equal terms.

KEYWORDS

Prompt Engineering; Large Language Models; Prompt Optimization; Multi-LLM Benchmarking; LLM-as-a-Judge; ROUGE; BLEU; FastAPI; React

Cite This Article

Radhika SN, Archana R, Anvita R, Inchara S N, Arundhathi C V, "AI-Based Prompt Optimizer, Evaluator & Multi-LLM Comparison Platform," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1-4, Oct 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM68453

Full Article/Conclusion

This paper presented the design of an AI-based prompt optimizer, evaluator and multi-LLM comparison platform. It combines a deterministic, explainable prompt-quality analyzer, a multi-round  LLM-driven  optimizer  and  concurrent, failure-isolated benchmarking across OpenAI, Google Gemini, Anthropic Claude and Groq. By scoring every response with a configurable-weight composite of reference-based lexical similarity, consistency, efficiency and LLM-as-a-judge results, and by saving every experiment for later comparison, the approach aims to replace ad hoc, unrecorded prompt trial and error with a reproducible and auditable workflow. It also provides a scalable base for future additions such as automated PDF reporting, ablation-study analysis and self-consistency majority voting in prompt-engineering tools.

References

[1]      Y. Zhou, A. I. Muresanu, Z. Han, K. Paster, S. Pitis, H. Chan, and J. Ba, “Large language models are human-level prompt engineers,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Learning Representations (ICLR), 2023. [2]      C. Yang, X. Wang, Y. Lu, H. Liu, Q. V. Le, D. Zhou, and X. Chen, “Large language models as optimizers,” in Proc. ICLR, 2024. [3]      L. Zheng, W.-L. Chiang, Y. Sheng, et al., “Judging LLM-as-a-judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), vol. 36, 2023. [4]      K. Papineni, S. Roukos, T. Ward, and W.-J. Zhu, “BLEU: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation,” in Proc. 40th Annu. Meeting of the ACL, 2002, pp. 311–318. [5]      C.-Y. Lin, “ROUGE: a package for automatic evaluation of summaries,” in Text Summarization Branches Out, ACL, 2004, pp. 74–81. [6]      B. Romera-Paredes, M. Barekatain, A. Novikov, M. Balog, et al., “Mathematical discoveries from program search with large language models,” Nature, vol. 625, pp. 468–475, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06924-6. [7]      F. Liu, X. Tong, M. Yuan, X. Lin, et al., “Evolution of heuristics: towards efficient automatic algorithm design using large language model,” in Proc. 41st Int. Conf. Machine Learning (ICML), 2024. [8]      N. van Stein and T. Bäck, “LLaMEA: a large language model evolutionary algorithm for automatically generating metaheuristics,” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 2024, doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2024.3402686. [9]      X. Wu, Y. Zhong, J. Wu, F. Liu, and Q. Zhang, “AS-LLM: when algorithm selection meets large language model,” arXiv:2307.08784, 2023. [10]    J. Wei, X. Wang, D. Schuurmans, M. Bosma, B. Ichter, F. Xia, E. Chi, Q. Le, and D. Zhou, “Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, 2022, pp. 24824–24837.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

10/31/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

9

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

9

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...