Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68400
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-4
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Computer Science & Engineering
G H Raisoni University, Amravati
Computer Science & Engineering
G H Raisoni University, Amravati
Computer Science & Engineering
G H Raisoni University, Amravati
Computer Science & Engineering
G H Raisoni University, Amravati
Computer Science & Engineering
G H Raisoni University, Amravati
Computer Science & Engineering
G H Raisoni University, Amravati
Computer Science & Engineering
G H Raisoni University, Amravati
Property document verification is a critical administrative process because inconsistent records, missing supporting documents, and fraudulent claims can create financial and legal risks. This paper presents an AI-based Property Document Verification System designed as a technical document-analysis and consistency-checking support tool. The system accepts property dossiers containing documents such as title deeds, tax receipts and No Objection Certificates (NOCs), converts scanned content into text using Optical Character Recognition (OCR), extracts important legal entities using rule-based NLP and regular expressions, and compares corresponding fields across documents. Fuzzy string matching and numerical tolerance checks identify owner-name variations, survey-number conflicts, area discrepancies, postal-code mismatches, missing documents, and duplicate ownership claims. An explainable heuristic risk engine combines anomalies into a 0–100 score and classifies a property into Low, Medium, or High risk. A human-in-the-loop workflow provides risk-prioritized review, geographic visualization and automated reports. Evaluation on a 13-scenario benchmark suite reported 100% classification alignment with expected risk tiers, while end-to-end processing averaged approximately 1.84 seconds per property. The system supports administrative verification and does not replace legal title adjudication or physical cadastral survey.
KEYWORDS
This paper presented an AI-Based Property Document Verification System integrating OCR, structured information extraction, cross-document fuzzy matching, explainable risk scoring and human administrative review. The system brings these steps together in one workflow for detecting inconsistencies in owner names, survey numbers, property areas, PIN codes and supporting documents. In the reported 13-scenario benchmark, all cases were classified according to their expected risk tiers and the measured end-to-end processing time was approximately 1.84 seconds per property. The system demonstrates the feasibility of AI-assisted document analysis for faster property verification while preserving human oversight. Final legal title determination must remain with authorized administrative or judicial processes. Experimental evaluations across 13 rigorous benchmark scenarios demonstrated that the pipeline handles highly complex real-world edge cases—ranging from distorted legacy deeds to sophisticated signature forgeries. Furthermore, the systematic latency performance analysis confirms that the core computational pipeline executes within highly acceptable operating envelopes, striking a functional balance between processing speed and the deep validation checks required for institutional applications
1. Xu, Y., Li, M., Cui, L., Huang, S., Wei, F., & Zhou, M. (2020). “LayoutLM: Pre-training of Text and Layout for Document Image Understanding.” Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/3394486.3403172https://www.ecva.net/papers/eccv_2022/papers_ECCV/ html/8042_ECCV_2022_paper.php4. Jaume, G., Ekenel, H. K., & Thiran, J.-P. (2019). “FUNSD: A Dataset for Form Understanding in Noisy Scanned Documents.” 2019 International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition Workshops (ICDARW).https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDARW.2019.10029 5. Mack, C. (2014). “PS1-13: Probabilistic Linkage (Also Known as ‘Fuzzy Matching’): The Theoretical Foundations of Modern Record Linkage.” eGEMs, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.11046. Wagner, R. A., & Fischer, M. J. (1974). “The String-to-String Correction Problem.” Journal of the ACM, 21(1), 168–173. https://doi.org/10.1145/321796.3218117. Dwivedi, S. K., et al. (2022). “Blockchain and IPFS-based Reliable Land Registry System.” Security and Privacy. https://doi.org/10.1002/spy2.2368. Levenshtein, V. I. (1966). “Binary Codes Capable of Correcting Deletions, Insertions, and Reversals.” Soviet Physics Doklady, 10(8), 707–710. Paper details9. Xu, Y., et al. (2024). “LayoutLLM: Large Language Model Instruction Tuning for Visually Rich Document Understanding.” Proceedings of LREC-COLING 2024. https://aclanthology.org/2024.lrec-main.892/
Publication Date
10/27/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...