Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67791
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Artificial Intelligence And Data Science
Arunai Enginnering College
Artificial Intelligence And Data Science
Arunai Enginnering College
Artificial Intelligence And Data Science
Arunai Enginnering College
Artificial Intelligence And Data Science
Arunai Enginnering College
Artificial Intelligence And Data Science
Arunai Enginnering College
Artificial Intelligence And Data Science
Arunai Enginnering College
Road crashes remain a leading killer of young people worldwide, and the delay before medical help arrives often decides whether a victim survives. Existing solutions usually address only one stage: forecasting dangerous conditions, monitoring the driver, or reporting a crash after impact. This paper integrates all three stages in a single low-cost framework. Module A classifies road-segment risk as low, medium or high from weather, road, traffic and time features using gradient-boosted trees, with SMOTE handling class imbalance. Module B tracks drowsiness through the eye aspect ratio and flags distraction, harsh braking and over-speeding from motion data. A fusion stage merges these outputs into one risk score that selects a graded voice warning. Module C recognises a probable crash from an acceleration spike combined with a sudden speed drop, allows a short cancellation window, and then sends the vehicle location to emergency contacts and the 112 service. The best risk model, XGBoost, reached 91.8% accuracy and a macro F1-score of 0.89. The crash module detected 47 of 50 simulated impacts with a mean alert latency of 11.7 s, including the 10 s cancellation window. The design runs on a smartphone or an inexpensive embedded board.
KEYWORDS
We have presented a framework that predicts road risk, watches the driver and reports a crash automatically within a single low-cost pipeline. Tree-ensemble models supply the road-level risk, a landmark-based ratio tracks drowsiness, and a two-condition crash rule with a cancel window keeps false alarms under control. XGBoost gave the best overall performance, with 91.8% accuracy, a macro F1-score of 0.89 and an AUC of 0.95. The next step is a larger field trial, together with a study of how drivers respond to graded warnings.
1. World Health Organization: Global Status Report on Road Safety 2023. WHO, Geneva (2023) 2. Ministry of Road Transport and Highways: Road Accidents in India 2022. Transport Research Wing, Government of India, New Delhi (2023) 3. Moosavi, S., Samavatian, M.H., Parthasarathy, S., Ramnath, R.: A Countrywide Traffic Accident Dataset. arXiv:1906.05409 (2019) 4. Moosavi, S., Samavatian, M.H., Parthasarathy, S., Teodorescu, R., Ramnath, R.: Accident Risk Prediction based on Heterogeneous Sparse Data: New Dataset and Insights. In: Proc. 27th ACM SIGSPATIAL Int. Conf. on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, pp. 33–42 (2019) 5. Breiman, L.: Random Forests. Mach. Learn. 45(1), 5–32 (2001) 6. Chen, T., Guestrin, C.: XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. In: Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 785–794 (2016) 7. Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., Ye, Q., Liu, T.-Y.: LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30, pp. 3146–3154 (2017) 8. Chawla, N.V., Bowyer, K.W., Hall, L.O., Kegelmeyer, W.P.: SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 16, 321–357 (2002) 9. Soukupová, T., Čech, J.: Real-Time Eye Blink Detection using Facial Landmarks. In: 21st Computer Vision Winter Workshop, Rimske Toplice, Slovenia (2016) 10. Kazemi, V., Sullivan, J.: One Millisecond Face Alignment with an Ensemble of Regression Trees. In: Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1867–1874 (2014)
Publication Date
10/10/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
8
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...