Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68632
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-4
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

department of computer science
indira college of commerce and science

department of computer science
indira college of commerce and science

department of computer science
indira college of commerce and science
Plenty of edible food gets thrown away every day, while many people nearby go without enough to eat. Part of the reason is that nobody has a quick, consistent way to decide what should happen to a surplus item. In this paper we build a small machine-learning system that looks at a retail food item and suggests one of four actions: Donate, Monitor, Discount or None. Our evidence comes from two places. We surveyed 29 food senders and 26 receivers, and we used a Kaggle inventory dataset of 1,000 records. After cleaning the data, we trained a Decision Tree, a Random Forest and a Logistic Regression model on 80% of the records and tested them on the other 200. Each model classified every test record correctly. In the Random Forest, spoilage chance, days until expiry, stock quantity and daily sales accounted for about 80% of the feature importance, and the survey respondents pointed to food safety, shelf life, quantity and distance as the details that matter most. A perfect score on a small dataset with two rare classes is not proof that the system would work in a real store, so we treat this work as a proof of concept that still needs testing on real donation records.
KEYWORDS
We set out to see whether survey evidence and retail inventory data could be combined to recommend an action for each food item. Three classifiers were trained on 800 records and tested on 200, and all of them reached 100% accuracy, precision, recall and F1-score. We kept the Decision Tree as the final model because it is the easiest to interpret. Spoilage chance, days until expiry, stock quantity and daily sales were the most influential features, and the surveys showed that food safety, shelf life, quantity and distance are what donors and receivers value most. Because the scores are perfect, the data is small and some classes are very rare, the system needs to be validated on real data before anyone relies on it. It is meant as an aid for decision-making, and judgements about food safety must stay with trained people.
[1] V. Suresh, A. N. Jonnalagadda, D. Jagdheesh and M. Balasubramanian, “ZeroHunger: A digital solution for reducing food waste and hunger alleviation,” 2025, doi: 10.2991/978-94-6463-866-0_67. [2] V. Dhanokar et al., “Annapurna: An intelligent food donation system with AI-based receiver recommendation,” 2026, doi: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150500008. [3] B. Bhargavi et al., “AI based food donation and distribution system,” 2026, doi: 10.17148/IJARCCE.2026.154313. [4] T.-S. Uen and L. F. Rodríguez, “Geospatial analytics and machine learning for forecasting county-level food waste in U.S. retail markets,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 231, Art. no. 108906, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2026.108906. [5] Z. Said et al., “Intelligent approaches for sustainable management and valorisation of food waste,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 377, Art. no. 128952, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.128952. [6] M. Rashvand, Y. Ren, D.-W. Sun, J. Senge, C. Krupitzer et al., “Artificial intelligence for prediction of shelf-life of various food products: Recent advances and ongoing challenges,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 159, Art. no. 104989, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2025.104989. [7] C. Trattner and D. Elsweiler, “Food recommender systems: Important contributions, challenges and future research directions,” 2017. [8] W. Min, S. Jiang and R. Jain, “Food recommendation: Framework, existing solutions and challenges,” 2019. [9] K. M. Hudak, E. Friedman, J. Johnson and S. E. Benjamin-Neelon, “Food bank donations in the United States: A landscape review of federal policies,” Nutrients, vol. 12, no. 12, Art. no. 3764, 2020, doi: 10.3390/nu12123764. [10] F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort et al., “Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 12, pp. 2825–2830, 2011.
Publication Date
10/31/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...