Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM66655
Volume:
10 |
8 |
Aug 2026
Pages:
1-8
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Computer Science and engineering
R.L.Jalappa Institute of technology
Computer Science and engineering(Data Science )
R.L.Jalappa Institute of technology
Computer Science and engineering (AI&ML)
R.L.Jalappa Institute of technology
Uterine cancer, particularly endometrial cancer, is one of the significant gynecological cancers affecting women globally. Its development is linked to several factors, including demographic characteristics, reproductive history, hormonal changes, metabolic conditions, and lifestyle factors [1][2]. Early identification of individuals who may be at risk can help them receive timely medical attention and improve their awareness of preventive healthcare measures [3]. Recent progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) has made it possible to process multiple patient-related factors and identify patterns associated with cancer risk [4][5]. This paper introduces an AI-Based Uterus Cancer Risk Prediction and Decision Support System that supports the preliminary assessment of uterine cancer risk using relevant patient data. The system combines an AI-driven prediction module with a Flask-based web application to collect patient details, generate a risk prediction, classify the level of risk, and provide suitable recommendations. A database is also incorporated to securely store user information and previous prediction records for future reference. The proposed system provides a simple and accessible platform for preliminary risk assessment and supports users in recognizing potential risk conditions and seeking appropriate medical consultation. The system is intended as a decision-support and awareness tool and does not replace professional clinical diagnosis.
KEYWORDS
The proposed AI-Based Uterus Cancer Risk Prediction System provides a web-based approach for preliminary cancer risk assessment using patient-related information and machine learning techniques. The system integrates data preprocessing, AI-based prediction, risk classification, recommendation generation, and prediction-history management into a single platform. The developed application provides users with a simple interface for entering relevant information and receiving a prediction with its corresponding confidence and risk category. The integration of recommendations and historical records further improves the usefulness of the system as a decision-support and health-awareness tool. The proposed approach demonstrates the potential of artificial intelligence to assist in the early assessment of cancer-related risk. However, the system should be considered a supportive tool rather than a replacement for clinical diagnosis. The reliability of the results depends on the quality and diversity of the dataset used for model development. Future work can focus on larger clinically validated datasets, improved model architectures, extensive external validation, and integration of explainable AI techniques to make predictions more transparent and clinically interpretable [37][38].
[1] H. Sung et al., “Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 209–249, 2021. [2] M. Crosbie et al., “Endometrial cancer,” The Lancet, vol. 399, no. 10333, pp. 1412–1428, 2022. [3] L. Morice, A. Leary, C. Creutzberg, N. Abu-Rustum, and E. Darai, “Endometrial cancer,” The Lancet, vol. 387, no. 10023, pp. 1094–1108, 2016. [4] N. Colombo et al., “ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO consensus conference on endometrial cancer: Diagnosis, treatment and follow-up,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 16–41, 2016. [5] N. Concin et al., “ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma,” International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 12–39, 2021. [6] A. Makker et al., “Endometrial cancer,” Nature Reviews Disease Primers, vol. 7, no. 1, 2021. [7] M. L. Lortet-Tieulent et al., “Impact of obesity on the risk of endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” International Journal of Cancer, 2018. [8] M. J. Lauby-Secretan et al., “Body fatness and cancer—viewpoint of the IARC Working Group,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 375, pp. 794–798, 2016. [9] L. C. Wise et al., “Risk factors for endometrial cancer: An umbrella review of the literature,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 145, no. 6, pp. 1414–1427, 2019. [10] M. Alblas et al., “Prediction models for endometrial cancer for the general population or symptomatic women: A systematic review,” Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, vol. 126, pp. 92–99, 2018.
Publication Date
8/10/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...