Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM61590
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The world of software development moves fast, and keeping code clean and reliable is more important than ever. Manual code reviews help, but theyâre slow, often inconsistent, and depend too much on the reviewerâs experience. Thatâs where our AI Code Review System (ACRS) comes in. It uses advanced AI and machine learning to automatically analyze code, using large language models trained on massive datasets. These models donât just spot simple errorsâthey actually understand how code is written, how itâs structured, and how it should work. So what does this system actually do for developers? It scans through code and gives instant feedback: points out mistakes, suggests ways to make things run smoother, and explains its reasoning. This makes the code easier to read, maintain, and upgrade. On top of that, it generates an overall âcode quality scoreâ based on how correct, efficient, and clean the code is. The best part is, the interface is designed to be simple and helpful. Developers donât have to rely on lengthy manual reviews, which means projects move faster. The research also digs into how AI code reviews stack up against classic static analysis tools. Basically, AI systems have an edge when it comes to understanding context and offering smarter recommendations. The ACRS isnât just for veteran coders, eitherâitâs a teaching tool for students and beginners, too. All in all, this system is a big leap forward for automated, intelligent, and scalable code reviews in todayâs fast-paced software industry.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/26/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
2
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...