Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM62463
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1--
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Masters of Computer Science
Pune Vidyarthi Griha College of Science and Commerce
Masters of Computer Science
Pune Vidyarthi Griha College of Science and Commerce
Masters of Computer Science
Pune Vidyarthi Griha College of Science and Commerce
The growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in education has raised concerns about their impact on students’ cognitive abilities. With the increasing use of AI platforms such as language models, automated tutoring systems, and instant answer generators, students are becoming more dependent on technology for completing academic tasks. This study examines how such dependency affects critical thinking and problem-solving skills among students at different educational levels. Critical thinking involves analyzing, evaluating, and understanding information independently, while problem-solving requires logical reasoning, creativity, and the ability to handle challenges. However, frequent use of AI tools may reduce students’ involvement in active learning. Instant answers provided by AI can limit deep thinking and create a habit of relying on technology instead of developing one’s own understanding. The research is based on the idea that cognitive skills develop through practice and effort. When students avoid struggling with problems, their ability to think independently may weaken over time. The study uses concepts from educational psychology and cognitive theories, along with student performance data, to analyze the relationship between AI usage and thinking skills. It also highlights the difference between using AI as a supportive learning tool and overusing it as a replacement for thinking. The aim of this research is to provide useful insights for educators to ensure that AI is used in a balanced way, supporting learning without reducing students’ intellectual development.
KEYWORDS
The increasing dependency on artificial intelligence among students has emerged as a double - edged sword in modern education, profoundly influencing their critical thinking and problem- solving abilities. This study reveals that while AI tools offer unprecedented efficiency in information retrieval, task completion, and idea generation, over-reliance on them often leads to diminished cognitive engagement. Students frequently bypass essential mental processes such as analysis, evaluation, and synthesis, resulting in shallower understanding, reduced creativity, and impaired independent problem-solving skills. Empirical evidence from surveys and performance assessments indicates a notable decline in original thought and resilience when faced with complex, unassisted challenges, underscoring how AI can inadvertently foster cognitive laziness rather than augmentation. Nevertheless, the findings do not advocate for the rejection of AI but emphasize the urgent need for balanced integration within pedagogical frameworks. Educational institutions must prioritize strategies that harness AI as a supportive scaffold—such as adaptive learning platforms paired with reflective exercises, AI literacy curricula, and assignments designed to require human-AI collaboration—while actively cultivating core competencies like logical reasoning, ethical judgment, and innovative thinking. By doing so, educators can mitigate the risks of dependency and transform AI into a catalyst for enhanced intellectual growth. Ultimately, as AI becomes ubiquitous in academic and professional landscapes, preserving and strengthening students’ critical thinking and problem-solving skills is not merely an educational imperative but a societal necessity. Future research should explore longitudinal impacts and innovative interventions to ensure that technology empowers rather than erodes human cognitive potential, equipping the next generation to thrive as discerning thinkers and adaptable problem- solvers in an AI-driven world.
1. Popalia, J. N., Al-Habsy, M., Akbar, M., & Affandi, A. (2026). AI Dependency and Critical Thinking in Higher Education: A Life-Course Perspective on Ethical Awareness and Algorithmic Bias. 2. Subudhi, S., Anumula, M., Akuthota, S., & Narayana, K. (2026). AI Dependency and Its Impact on Critical Thinking Skills Among College-Going Students. 3. Hussain, S. S., Ahmad, J., & Ahmed, S. (2025). Investigating the Impacts of Heavy Reliance on AI on Students’ Critical Thinking and Originality. 4. Syahcorina, M. P., Fitria, L., & Yunus, Y. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Dependency and Critical Thinking: A Correlational Study. 5. Study on AI Dependence and Cognitive Fatigue. (2025). Learners' AI Dependence and Critical Thinking: Psychological Mechanisms. 6. Bearman, M., Ryan, J., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Discourses of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Critical Literature Review. 7. Zhang, X., et al. (2024). Artificial Intelligence-Generated Content and Its Impact on Critical Thinking. 8. Lu, Y., et al. (2025). Artificial Intelligence-Generated Content and Its Impact on Critical Thinking. 9. Selwyn, N. (2019). Should Robots Replace Teachers? AI and the Future of Education. 10. Zheng, B., Warschauer, M., Lin, C. H., & Chang, C. (2020). Learning in One-to- One Laptop Environments: A Meta-Analysis and Research Synthesis. 11. Johnson, L., & Smith, R. (2021). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Ethical Challenges and Academic Integrity. 12. Kumar, S., & Singh, P. (2022). AI Literacy and Its Impact on Student Learning Outcomes in Indian Higher Education.
Publication Date
5/4/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
14
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...