Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM64219
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-7
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Computer Science and Engineering
JIS College of Engineering

Computer Science and Engineering
JIS College of Engineering

Computer Science and Engineering
JIS College of Engineering
Diagnosing pneumonia from chest X-rays is getting tougher these days. Radiologists are juggling more cases and fatigue sets in fast. While deep learning speeds things up, most standard AI models are still “black boxes”—they make predictions without giving any clue on how they got there. That’s a problem in medicine, where trust and clarity matter. So, here’s what we built: an Explainable AI (XAI) diagnostic platform based on the MobileNetV2 architecture. We took advantage of transfer learning and heavy data augmentation, and after 28 training epochs, the model reached a solid 94.2% validation accuracy. The best part isn’t just the numbers. We pulled in Grad-CAM to make the whole process transparent—so instead of tossing out a diagnosis and calling it a day, the system creates heatmaps that highlight exactly where the model sees signs of fluid or infection in the X-ray. Now, doctors don’t just get an answer—they can see the evidence behind it, making it a lot easier to trust and double-check the results. To fit this into real hospital workflows, we made sure everything runs through a secure, local web dashboard built with PHP and Python. Uploading an X-ray is effortless, reviewing the AI’s heatmaps is quick, and you can instantly save or print compliant PDF reports. The design is simple on purpose—no extra hurdles, just useful info. By blending strong computer vision with open, clear explanations, our platform aims to be a reliable helper, letting doctors stay in control without slowing them down.
KEYWORDS
Deep learning isn’t just tweaking how respiratory diagnostics happen—it’s flipping the whole script. Medical professionals aren’t stuck squinting at X-rays by themselves anymore. Now, algorithms do the heavy lifting, running calculations and spotting patterns that might slip past even the keenest human eye[4]. In our study, we really put that to the test. We took MobileNetV2—a model already known for its efficiency—and tuned it using transfer learning[1], then threw in plenty of real-time data tweaks to make it even sharper[17]. The results? Almost 96.5% training accuracy, and the validation accuracy sat close behind at 94.2%. That tight gap tells you everything you need to know: the model’s not just parroting back the training data. It actually knows how to handle fresh, real-world cases. What’s even more important is how accessible we’ve made this. Instead of demanding banks of high-powered GPUs or deep pockets for server time, our system runs just fine on a typical office computer[9]. A regular desktop in a local clinic? Good enough. We wanted to make sure clinics—and not just those in big, well-funded hospitals—could put this tool to work, even with limited technical staff or tight budgets. But here’s the thing: accuracy sitting on a lab’s shelf doesn’t help patients or doctors in a busy ward. Deep learning models are notorious for being black boxes—sometimes they just spit out results, and nobody can say why. That’s not good enough when decisions involve a person’s life. To open up that black box, we built an interactive, web-based dashboard with a full suite of explainable AI tools[8]. For each X-ray, Grad-CAM visualizations kick in, literally spotlighting the murky spots on lung images[7]: regions that look extra cloudy, fluid build-ups, strange shadows that might signal something serious. Instead of dumping a probability score and calling it a day, the dashboard overlays clear, color-coded heatmaps right on the scan, along with confidence numbers. It’s evidence you can see—not just trust. Suddenly, doctors don’t have to guess why the AI said what it did. They get concrete visuals they can interrogate and discuss with colleagues or even with patients’ families. We designed this system to help—not sideline—the experts. It’s not here to replace doctors, but to offer real, stress-relieving support when their workload piles up. The dashboard slides right into their routines, without forcing them to learn a dozen new workflows or deal with admin headaches. Radiologists spend less time hunched over screens and more time focusing on tricky cases. Fast triaging becomes possible, and standardized, easy-to-read PDF reports automatically sum up the findings, showing both the untouched X-ray and the highlighted suspicious spots for comparison. Since it’s all built on lightweight tech (just PHP and MySQL), it doesn’t care if it’s in a city hospital or a rural clinic with spotty internet—it fits right in, reliably and smoothly. And we’re just scratching the surface. The way the system’s built, it’s ready to level up. With a bit more training, it can learn to tell apart not just pneumonia, but what kind—bacterial, viral, fungal, you name it. We know there’s a massive need to spot things like COVID-19, tuberculosis, and other tricky lung conditions. Our model’s architecture allows for these planned updates. Plus, there’s a clear path to move everything to a cloud-based web app and API, which opens doors for remote clinics or developing areas. When specialist doctors are hours—or even days—away, instant, trustworthy diagnostics from the cloud can genuinely change outcomes for patients. In the end, this isn’t just about math or computer vision. It’s about creating tools that work for people: understandable, efficient, and ready to scale wherever they’re needed. We believe this is a crucial step toward a future where artificial intelligence empowers, rather than intimidates, both medical staff and the communities they serve. Whether it’s in big-city ERs or one-room clinics, this kind of AI doesn’t just promise better diagnostics; it makes them possible for everyone
[1] F. Alshanketi, A. Alharbi, M. Kuruvilla, V. Mahzoon, S. T. Siddiqui, N. Rana, and A. Tahir, "Pneumonia detection from chest X-ray images using deep learning and transfer learning for imbalanced datasets," Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine, vol. 38, no. 1, 2024. [2] J. Colin and N. Surantha, "Interpretable deep learning for pneumonia detection using chest X-ray images," Information, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 53, 2025. [3] N. Darapaneni, A. Ranjan, D. Bright, D. Trivedi, K. Kumar, V. Kumar, and A. R. Paduri, "Pneumonia detection in chest X-rays using neural networks," arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.03618, 2022. [4] D. S. Kermany, M. Goldbaum, W. Zhang, and K. Zhang, "Identifying medical diagnoses and treatable diseases by image-based deep learning," Cell, vol. 172, no. 5, pp. 1122–1131, 2018. [5] I. D. Mienye, "Deep convolutional neural networks in medical image analysis: A review," Information, vol. 16, no. 3, p. 195, 2025. [6] M. Sandler, A. Howard, M. Zhu, A. Zhmoginov, and L. C. Chen, "MobileNetV2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks," in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 4510–4520, 2018. [7] R. R. Selvaraju, M. Cogswell, A. Das, R. Vedantam, D. Parikh, and D. Batra, "Grad-CAM: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization," in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 618–626, 2017. [8] M. T. Zamir, "Explainable AI-driven analysis of radiology reports using text and image data: Experimental study," JMIR Formative Research, vol. 9, e77482, 2025. [9] M. S. A. Reshan, K. S. Gill, V. Anand, S. Gupta, H. Alshahrani, A. Sulaiman, and A. Shaikh, "Detection of pneumonia from chest X-ray images utilizing MobileNet model," Healthcare, vol. 11, no. 11, p. 1561, 2023. [10] D. Zhang, F. Ren, Y. Li, L. Na, and Y. Ma, "Pneumonia detection from chest X-ray images based on convolutional neural network," Electronics, vol. 10, no. 13, p. 1512, 2021.
Publication Date
5/28/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...