Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM62661
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-4
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Artificial Intelligence and Data Science
Knowledge Institute of Technology

Artificial Intelligence and Data Science
Knowledge Institute of Technology

Artificial Intelligence and Data Science
Knowledge Institute of Technology

Artificial Intelligence and Data Science
Knowledge Institute of Technology
Artificial Intelligence and Data Science
Knowledge Institute of Technology
Telecom towers require a continuous and reliable power supply to maintain uninterrupted communication services. However, existing energy management systems are largely reactive, leading to inefficient resource utilization and increased dependence on diesel generators during grid outages. This paper presents an AI-driven smart energy scheduling framework that integrates demand forecasting and outage prediction to improve operational efficiency. A Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model is employed to capture temporal patterns in energy consumption and predict short-term demand, while a Random Forest classifier estimates the probability of grid outages using temporal features such as hour and day of the week. These predictions are incorporated into a context-aware scheduling algorithm that considers battery state-of-charge (SOC) and operational constraints to dynamically allocate energy between grid, battery, and diesel sources. The scheduler also includes necessity-aware logic to prevent unnecessary charging and improve decision efficiency. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed system achieves consistent reductions in operational cost and diesel usage compared to conventional reactive approaches, while maintaining reliability under uncertain conditions.
KEYWORDS
This paper presented an AI-driven smart energy scheduling system for telecom microgrids by integrating demand forecasting and outage prediction into a unified decision-making framework. The proposed approach combines an LSTM-based model for short-term energy demand prediction with a Random Forest classifier for estimating outage probability, enabling the system to make proactive and context-aware scheduling decisions. The results demonstrate that the predictive scheduler achieves consistent reductions in operational cost and diesel consumption compared to conventional reactive methods. Although the improvements are moderate, they highlight the effectiveness of incorporating predictive intelligence into energy management systems. The inclusion of necessity-aware logic further enhances system efficiency by avoiding unnecessary battery charging and ensuring optimal resource utilization. Overall, the proposed system improves energy efficiency while maintaining reliability under uncertain conditions, making it a suitable approach for real-world telecom applications. Future work may focus on improving outage prediction accuracy, incorporating real-time data, and extending the system to multi-tower environments for large-scale deployment.
[1] S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, “Long Short-Term Memory,” Neural Computation, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735–1780, 1997. [2] L. Breiman, “Random Forests,” Machine Learning, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 5–32, 2001. [3] G. Zhang, B. E. Patuwo, and M. Y. Hu, “Forecasting with artificial neural networks: The state of the art,” International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 35–62, 1998. [4] X. Fang, S. Misra, G. Xue, and D. Yang, “Smart grid — The new and improved power grid: A survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 944–980, 2012. [5] A. Kusiak, H. Zheng, and Z. Song, “Short-term prediction of wind farm power: A data mining approach,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 125–136, 2009. [6] Y. Wang, Q. Chen, T. Hong, and C. Kang, “Review of smart meter data analytics: Applications, methodologies, and challenges,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 3125–3148, 2019. [7] J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, “Particle swarm optimization,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Neural Networks, 1995, pp. 1942–1948. [8] M. H. Albadi and E. F. El-Saadany, “A summary of demand response in electricity markets,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 78, no. 11, pp. 1989–1996, 2008.
Publication Date
5/6/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
10
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...