Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM40455
Volume:
9 |
1 |
Jan 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Symptom- grounded complaint vaticination has come in- creasingly important in healthcare due to the growing need for accurate, early judgments and substantiated treatment plans. Traditional opinion styles calculate heavily on mortal moxie, which can be time- consuming and prone to crimes, especially with complex or coinciding symptoms. The integration of machine literacy( ML) and deep literacy( DL) ways has significantly enhanced automated complaint vaticination systems, enabling briskly and more accurate prognostications. still, chal- lenges remain, particularly in handling deficient symptom data, perfecting vaticination delicacy for rare conditions, and icing model interpretability. This check paper reviews the current state of exploration in symptom- grounded complaint vaticination models, including machine literacy algorithms, cold-blooded approaches, and data preprocessing ways. It also explores recent advance- ments in using neural networks and natural language processing NLP) for symptom analysis. also, the check proposes a frame that combines multi-modal data emulsion, bettered algorithmic performance, and resolvable AI to give further de- pendable and interpretable prognostications. The check examines the technological inventions, challenges, and unborn operations of this approach in clinical decision support systems
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
3/31/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...