Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM25441
Volume:
7 |
8 |
Aug 2023
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Autonomous navigation of vehicles at various places can tremendously improve daily traversal, especially while driving in unfamiliar territory. Path-planning systems have been continuously improved to cope with increasingly difficult issues and advances in computing technology. One example is the rise of sampling-based planners, which made difficult planning issues easier to solve. As a result, problems that were previously thought difficult can now be addressed, and even dynamical constraints can be overcome. The ongoing modifications and study in path planning are aimed at achieving robotic systems’ full autonomy. By relying solely on path planning approaches, this goal has not been fully realized. The majority of path-planning algorithms work well in simulations and laboratory robots, but real- world robots operate in unknown surroundings and interact with other agents whose motion is often unpredictable and whose conduct can be uncooperative. Real robots have inherent kinematical and dynamical (kinodynamical) constraints that make autonomous collision-free motion impossible in particular circumstances. This research demonstrates the implementation, testing, and comparison of two path-planning algorithms for autonomous navigation of a vehicle/rover, namely rapidly-exploring random trees (RRT) and second probabilistic roadmap (PRM). Using random samples from the search space, an RRT generates a tree rooted at the beginning configuration. As each sample is drawn, a link is made between it and the state closest to it in the tree. This results in the adding of the new state to the tree if the link is viable (goes wholly across free space and obeys all constraints). The main idea underlying PRM, on the other hand, is to pick random samples from the robot’s configuration space, test them to see whether they are in the free space, and then use a local planner to connect these configurations to other adjacent configurations. The beginning and goal configurations are
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
8/28/2023
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...