Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM58929
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Let’s face it, the old way of walking fields and guessing at crop health just doesn’t cut it anymore. Food security is a growing problem, and farmers need smarter tools. That’s where new AI-powered drone system steps in. It’s built for real work, not just showing off tech for tech’s sake. Here’s how it goes: imagine your fields dotted with small IOT sensors, each one quietly watching over soil moisture and water quality. They’re running on low-cost, programmable ESP32 hardware—nothing fancy, but reliable. Most of the time, the drones stay parked. But the second a sensor picks up trouble—say, a patch of soil gets too dry or water quality drops—the system jumps into action. The drone takes off on its own and heads straight to the problem spot, guided by GPS and the sensor’s alert. Once there, it snaps high-res images of the crops below. No more guesswork—these images go through a machine learning pipeline built with Tensor-Flow and K-eras, using deep Convolutional Neural Networks. The system checks for early signs of yellowing, wilting, or pests—stuff you don’t want to miss. After that, the results and clear, practical advice—like when to water—pop up on a central dashboard. This setup isn’t about replacing farmers; it’s about giving them a break from endless scouting and letting them focus on bigger decisions. By only sending out drones when needed, it saves energy and cuts down costs. Early data shows a 40% faster response to crop diseases and up to 30% better use of resources. In the end, it’s a smart, affordable way to bring precision farming to the people who need it most, making farms more efficient—without all the extra work.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
7/3/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...