AI-Powered Video Surveillance for Object Detection and Tracking

Automated tracking systems are inherently flawed. Objects with similar appearances might accidentally swap identifiers, while visual obstructions can easily fragment established tracks. Furthermore, the reliability of detection can be severely compromised by dense crowds, camera shaking, heavy shadows, adverse weather (like rain or glare), and poor video resolution. It is crucial to remember that a system-assigned track ID is merely a transient marker, not a confirmation of a person's actual identity. Movement tracked on a two-dimensional screen does not confirm intent or exact physical traversal distances. Additionally, automated event rules are prone to generating both false negatives and false positives, necessitating rigorous testing before real-world deployment. Implementing such a system must strictly adhere to relevant legal frameworks and organizational guidelines. Suggested privacy protections involve establishing a firm data retention schedule, utilizing robust encryption, securing physical and digital storage, limiting data access, and explicitly stating the surveillance purpose. Technologies like facial recognition or advanced identity estimation must never be integrated without explicit legal approval and independent ethical justification. Whenever feasible, video processing should occur locally, archiving only the absolute minimum amount of metadata required. Finally, human supervisors must evaluate any system-generated alerts before any significant actions are taken. These statements serve as best-practice guidelines; this paper makes no assertion that a fully audited, secure system has been successfully deployed.

[1] A. Karbalaie, F. Abtahi, and M. Sjöström, “Event detection in surveillance videos: a review,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 81, pp. 35463–35501, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11042-021-11864-2. [2] H. Ben Mabrouk and E. Zagrouba, “Abnormal behavior recognition for intelligent video surveillance systems: A review,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 91, pp. 480–491, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.09.029. [3] D. R. Patrikar and M. R. Parate, “Anomaly detection using edge computing in video surveillance system: review,” International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 85–110, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s13735-022-00227-8. [4] A. Bewley, Z. Ge, L. Ott, F. Ramos, and B. Upcroft, “Simple online and realtime tracking,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 2016, pp. 3464–3468, doi: 10.1109/ICIP.2016.7533003. [5] N. Wojke, A. Bewley, and D. Paulus, “Simple online and realtime tracking with a deep association metric,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 2017, pp. 3645–3649, doi: 10.1109/ICIP.2017.8296962. [6] Y. Zhang et al., “ByteTrack: Multi-object tracking by associating every detection box,” in Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2022, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-20047-2_1. [Verify final proceedings page range if required by the journal.] [7] A. Yadav, A. Chaturvedi, and S. Rani, “Object detection and tracking using YOLOv8 and DeepSORT,” in Advancements in Communication and Systems, 2024, pp. 81–90, doi: 10.56155/978-81-955020-7-3-7. [Verify metadata against the publisher record.] [8] H. Jeon, H. Kim, D. Kim, and J. Kim, “PASS-CCTV: Proactive anomaly surveillance system for CCTV footage analysis in adverse environmental conditions,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 254, art. 124391, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124391. [9] Y. Park, L. M. Dang, S. Lee, D. Han, and H. Moon, “Multiple object tracking in deep learning approaches: A survey,” Electronics, vol. 10, no. 19, art. 2406, 2021, doi: 10.3390/electronics10192406. [10] Z. Guan et al., “Multi-object tracking review: retrospective and emerging trend,” Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 58, art. 235, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10462-025-11212-y.