Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM63079
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-8
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Management
Bhavans PALSAR Law college
This study adopts a quantitative research methodology to examine the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education and its influence on academic practices, professional identity, and human–AI collaboration among academics. A descriptive and analytical research design was employed to obtain measurable and generalizable insights into the emerging phenomenon of Aidemics within academic institutions. The study collected primary data through a structured questionnaire administered to academics from diverse disciplines and institution types. A total of 350 valid responses were obtained using purposive and convenience sampling techniques. The respondents included faculty members who actively utilize AI tools in teaching, research, curriculum development, academic writing, data analysis, administrative functions, and other professional activities. The questionnaire was designed using established constructs from prior literature and measured variables related to AI integration, AI competency, ethical AI usage, perceived usefulness of AI, academic identity transformation, human–AI collaboration, and concerns regarding AI colonialism and loss of human agency. Responses were measured using a five-point Likert scale ranging from “Strongly Disagree” to “Strongly Agree.” The quantitative approach enables statistical examination of relationships among variables and provides broader insights into how academics perceive and adapt to AI-enabled work environments. The study focuses on academics representing multiple disciplinary backgrounds and varying levels of AI usage intensity. This diversity strengthens the generalizability of the findings and allows for a comprehensive understanding of the Aidemics phenomenon across different higher-education contexts.
KEYWORDS
The present study examined the emerging phenomenon of Aidemics and explored how artificial intelligence is transforming academic work, professional identity, and human–AI collaboration in higher education institutions. The findings reveal that AI integration, AI competency, ethical AI awareness, and human–AI collaboration significantly contribute to responsible AI adoption and academic performance enhancement among academicians in Kerala. The study further demonstrates that academics increasingly perceive AI as a collaborative partner capable of improving efficiency, productivity, and innovation in teaching, research, curriculum development, and administrative functions. However, the findings also emphasize that effective AI adoption requires strong human oversight, ethical judgment, and critical thinking to ensure responsible and sustainable usage within academic environments. The emergence of Aidemics reflects a shift toward balanced human–AI collaboration where technological capabilities complement rather than replace human intellectual contribution. At the same time, the study highlights important concerns relating to AI colonialism, technological dependency, and the potential erosion of academic autonomy and human agency. Although AIdriven transformation offers substantial opportunities for higher education institutions, unequal access to AI technologies and the dominance of global technological actors may create new forms of epistemic inequality and professional uncertainty. Therefore, the study concludes that higher education institutions must adopt inclusive, ethical, and context-sensitive AI policies that promote digital literacy, responsible AI practices, and equitable technological access among academics. Institutional support through AI training, ethical governance frameworks, and professional development initiatives will be essential in fostering sustainable human–AI collaboration in academia. The study contributes to the growing discourse on AI in higher education by introducing empirical insights into the concept of Aidemics and offering a foundation for future research on ethical and human-centered AI integration in academic work.
Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., Negrea, V., Oxley, E., Pham, P., Chong, S. W., & Siemens, G. (2024). A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: a call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z Atchley, P., Pannell, H., Wofford, K., Hopkins, M., & Atchley, R. A. (2024). Human and AI collaboration in the higher education environment: opportunities and concerns. Cognitive Research Principles and Implications, 9(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-024-00547-9 Nguyen, A., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Huang, X. (2024). Human-AI collaboration patterns in AIassisted academic writing. Studies in Higher Education, 49(5), 847–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2323593 Belda-Medina, J., & Kokošková, V. (2023). Integrating chatbots in education: insights from the Chatbot-Human Interaction Satisfaction Model (CHISM). International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00432-3 Wilke, A., Van Rhijn, T., Squires, K., & Barton, K. (2024). Digital Bonds: Exploring the Impact of Computer-Mediated Communication on Parent–Educator Relationships in Early Childhood Education and care. Education Sciences, 14(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020123 Rahiem, M. D. (2026). Generative AI in higher education in Indonesia: Patterns of use and learning impact. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102672 Salisu, I., Almutairi, E. M. N., & Al-Samhi, N. M. (2026). Creativity in the age of AI: Exploring moderated mediation relationships between AI use, AI dependence, and academic support in higher education. Acta Psychologica, 266, 106825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106825 Pangestu, F. N. N., Hamidah, I., Widaningsih, L., Abdullah, A. G., & Saputra, N. A. (2026). A scoping literature review of prompt engineering for bridging students AI literacy in higher education. Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence, 10, 100581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100581 Zheng, L., Long, M., Chen, B., & Fan, Y. (2023). Promoting knowledge elaboration, socially shared regulation, and group performance in collaborative learning: an automated assessment and feedback approach based on knowledge graphs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00415-4 Nguyen, A., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Huang, X. (2024b). Human-AI collaboration patterns in AI- assisted academic writing. Studies in Higher Education, 49(5), 847–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2323593 Vendrell, M., & Johnston, S. (2026). Scaffolding critical thinking with generative AI: Design principles for integrating large language models in higher education. Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence, 10, 100572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100572 Ma, Y., Su, Y., Li, M., Zhang, Y., Chai, W., Huang, A., & Zhao, X. (2025). Preparing Students for an AI-Driven World: Generative AI and curriculum reform in higher education. Frontiers of Digital Education., 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44366-025-0067-6 Alfredo, R., Echeverria, V., Jin, Y., Yan, L., Swiecki, Z., Gašević, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2023b). Human-Centred Learning Analytics and AI in Education: a Systematic Literature Review. arXiv (Cornell University).
Publication Date
5/12/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
2
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...