Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM60521
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Over the past decade, ESG criteria have moved from the periphery of investment analysis to its centre, yet the infrastructure supporting ESG evaluation has not kept pace. Rating agencies disagree with each other, companies report what suits them, and the smaller businesses that make up the vast majority of the global economy are effectively shut out of sustainable finance markets entirely. This paper examines how AI, Natural Language Processing (NLP), and machine learning are being deployed to address these gaps, drawing on a systematic review of eleven empirical studies. The findings are, in places, counterintuitive. Simple Linear Regression outperforms LSTM networks and BERT on corporate ESG text corpora — achieving 68.09% accuracy compared to 25.53% and 46.81% respectively — because corporate sustainability reports are so formulaic that deep learning models overfit to noise rather than signal. Where AI does deliver clear operational gains is inside structured enterprise architectures, where a 40% reduction in manual processing time has been documented. This review synthesizes these findings into a proposed algorithmic accountability architecture aligned with ISSB convergence efforts, and maps a realistic path toward democratising ESG compliance across firm sizes and geographies.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/18/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...