Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM64254
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-3
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
High School Education
Vikhe Patil Memorial School
Short form videos are present everywhere today, especially on apps like TikTok and Instagram. These platforms constantly show users new personalized content designed to keep them engaged. While many studies have looked at screen time, fewer have examined how these algorithms themselves affect thinking. In this study, I explored whether algorithm driven short videos affect attention, focus, and memory in teenagers. Sixty students were divided into three groups: - one watched algorithm based short videos, one watched the same videos without personalization, and one watched a longer, continuous video. After 20 minutes, they completed tasks to test attention, focus, and memory. The results showed that students who watched algorithm-based content had more difficulty focusing, they switched tasks more often, gave up faster on difficult tasks, and remembered less after a delay. This suggests that the way content is delivered, not just what we watch, it can affect how our brains work.
KEYWORDS
This study shows that algorithm-based short form content can negatively affect attention, focus, and memory in teenagers. As these platforms become more common, it is important to understand how they influence the way we think and learn.
Daniel Kahneman (1973). Attention and effort. John Sweller (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving. Eyal Ophir, Clifford Nass, and Anthony D. Wagner (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Gloria Mark, Daniela Gudith, and Ulrich Klocke. (2008). The cost of interrupted work. Dr. Sophia Leroy (2009). Attention residue. Tristan Harris (2016). How technology hijacks attention. Henry L. Roediger III and Jeffrey D. Karpick (2006). Test-enhanced learning.
Publication Date
5/29/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
11
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...