Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM56838
Volume:
10 |
2 |
Feb 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Accessibility defects in modern software development frequently originate during the visual design stage, where dynamic interactions, focus management, and assistive technology expectations are insufficiently specified. Existing accessibility plugins within design environments predominantly function as static linters (e.g., color contrast checkers) or manual documentation kits, leaving critical behavioral accessibility guidance deferred to the engineering phase. This paper introduces a workflow-native, agentic system embedded within Figma and synchronized with developer workspaces (e.g., VS Code) that autonomously generates structured, screen-specific accessibility annotation reports. Guided by strict heuristic and WAI-ARIA Authoring Practices, the system utilizes a multi-model Large Language Model (LLM) engine to parse design artifacts and output deterministic Markdown documentation detailing keyboard interaction sequences, focus order, and screen reader announcements. Through an expert agreement analysis across 24 enterprise screens and a downstream quality assurance (QA) implementation study, we demonstrate that the system achieves substantial expert alignment (κ = 0.76) and reduces downstream accessibility defects by 32%. We argue that embedding AI-driven, documentation-first accessibility agents directly into the design-to-development pipeline effectively mitigates structural gaps in accessible product engineering.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
2/23/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...