Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM55020
Volume:
9 |
12 |
Dec 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This article provides an in-depth examination of āhāra (“nutriment”) within the Pāḷi canon Nikāyas, Vinaya, Abhidhamma, and Aṭṭhakathā, contending that the four nutriments (kabaliṅkāra-āhāra, phassa-āhāra, mano-sañcetanā-āhāra, viññāṇa-āhāra) serve as a doctrinal nexus connecting Buddhist psychology, ethics, and soteriology. This study employs philological methods (lexical range, intertextual resonance, translation choices) in conjunction with doctrinal analysis (conditionality, paṭiccasamuppāda, requisites reflections) and a selective comparative examination of Āgama parallels to delineate how āhāra organizes experience and action from sensory perception to volitional activity. In the Nikāyas, āhāra elucidates the interplay of craving, contact, and consciousness; in the Vinaya, it establishes ethical principles through regulations concerning food, medicine, and conduct; in the Abhidhamma, it is codified as āhāra-paccaya among the twenty-four conditions; and in the commentarial layers, it is organized into a cohesive framework of restraint and sufficiency. Principal findings indicate that conceptualizing consumption as material, cognitive, and karmic “fuel” elucidates moral psychology without assuming a self, clarifies the pedagogy of moderation, and uncovers avenues through which disciplined contemplation of sustenance diminishes taṇhā and upādāna, thus fostering liberative insight.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
9/11/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...