Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67662
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-4
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Electronics and Communication Engineering
Priyadarshini College of Engineering

Electronics and Communication Engineering
Priyadarshini College of Engineering

Electronics and Communication Engineering
Priyadarshini College of Engineering

Electronics and Communication Engineering
Priyadarshini College of Engineering

Electronics and Communication Engineering
Priyadarshini College of Engineering
The rapid development of artificial intelligence enables realistic speech generation through text-to-speech, voice cloning, and speech synthesis, which can also be misused for impersonation, fraud, and misinformation. This paper presents “An Edge Device for Real-Time Fake and Tampered Audio Detection,” a software-based system that uses Digital Signal Processing (DSP) techniques to analyze audio authenticity. The input audio is divided into short frames, and features such as Zero Crossing Rate (ZCR) variance, Auto-Correlation (AC) variance, and Root Mean Square (RMS) variance are extracted to capture variations in phonetic activity, pitch periodicity, and amplitude dynamics. A mathematical scoring and decision mechanism combines these features to estimate whether an audio signal is AI-generated or manipulated. The system aims to provide a lightweight and responsive solution for real-time audio authenticity analysis while considering challenges such as noise, compression, and recording conditions.
KEYWORDS
The work presented a software-based framework for real-time fake and tampered audio detection using DSP techniques. The system analyzes short audio frames using ZCR variance, Auto-Correlation variance, and RMS variation to assess temporal activity, periodicity, and amplitude dynamics. The approach provides a lightweight and interpretable method for audio authenticity analysis; however, its reliability can be affected by noise, echo, compression, recording conditions, and advances in synthetic speech. Future work can improve robustness using additional features, diverse datasets, adaptive thresholds, and machine-learning or deep-learning models. Overall, the proposed system provides a foundation for real-time audio authenticity analysis.
[1] R. Korycki, “Time and spectral analysis methods with machine learning for the authentication of digital audio recordings,” Forensic Science International, vol. 230, no. 1–3, pp. 117–126, 2013. [2] DGMA, “Artificial Intelligence Approach To Improve Lifespan Of Wireless Sensor Network : A Survey “” International Conference on Innovation & Development of Future Smart Cities, pp. 1–9. [3] J. Yamagishi et al., “ASVspoof 2021: Accelerating progress in spoofed and deepfake speech detection,” Proc. ASVspoof Challenge Workshop, pp. 47–54, 2021. [4] J.-W. Jung et al., “AASIST: Audio Anti-Spoofing Using Integrated Spectro-Temporal Graph Attention Networks,” Proc. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 6367–6371, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ICASSP43922.2022.9747766. [5] J. Yi, C. Wang, J. Tao, X. Zhang, C. Y. Zhang, and Y. Zhao, “Audio Deepfake Detection: A Survey,” IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 2023. [6] H. Tak, J. Patino, D. Delgado, M. Todisco, A. Nautsch, N. Evans, and A. Larcher, “End-to-End Anti-Spoofing with RawNet2,” Proc. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2021. [7] X. Wang et al., “ASVspoof 2019: A Large-Scale Public Database of Synthesized, Converted and Replayed Speech,” Computer Speech & Language, vol. 64, 2020. [8] B. Ustubioglu, G. Tahaoglu, and G. Ulutas, “Detection of Audio Copy-Move-Forgery with Novel Feature Matching on Mel Spectrogram,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 213, 2023, Art. no. 118963, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118963. [9] H.-P. Hsu et al., “Detection of Audio Tampering Based on Electric Network Frequency Signal,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 16, Art. no. 7029, 2023, doi: 10.3390/s23167029. [10] Z. Almutairi and H. Elgibreen, “A Review of Modern Audio Deepfake Detection Methods: Challenges and Future Directions,” Algorithms, vol. 15, no. 5, Art. no. 155, 2022, doi: 10.3390/a15050155.
Publication Date
10/5/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
9
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...