Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM56314
Volume:
10 |
1 |
Jan 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Due to their ease of use and computational effectiveness, traditional face recognition methods like Local Binary Patterns (LBP) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) have been thoroughly researched conventional face recognition techniques such as Local Binary Patterns (LBP) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) are widely used because they are simple to implement and computationally efficient. However, their performance in real-world situations is still limited. This paper presents an experimental study to examine how elements like changes in circumstances of lighting, variations in face pose, complex backgrounds influence the performance of conventional face recognition methods. Recognition accuracy is assessed using benchmark datasets representing controlled, semi-controlled, and unconstrained environments. The experimental results show that classical methods perform well in controlled conditions but their accuracy decreases significantly when illumination varies or when backgrounds become complex. These findings highlight the limitations of manually designed feature-based approaches and indicate the need for more advanced representation learning methods for reliable biometric recognition.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
2/1/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...