Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM.NCET004
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-5
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Information Technology
Syed Ammal Arts and Science College
Information Technology
Syed Ammal Arts and Science College
Information Technology
Syed Ammal Arts and Science College
Information Technology
Syed Ammal Arts and Science College
Phishing URLs remain a practical cybersecurity problem because attackers can imitate legitimate web addresses while attempting to obtain credentials, financial information, or other sensitive data. This paper proposes an explainable and feature-efficient machine-learning framework for real-time phishing URL detection. The framework extracts lexical and structural characteristics from URLs, applies feature-selection methods to reduce computational cost, and combines predictive models with explainability techniques that identify factors contributing to each classification. Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, and Random Forest are selected as baseline models. The protocol evaluates accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, false-positive rate, inference latency, explanation latency, and resource use. A Python prototype is designed to classify a URL as legitimate or phishing and return an interpretable explanation. The manuscript primarily defines the research design and analysis protocol; the numerical results retained from the source are marked for verification rather than treated as independently validated.
KEYWORDS
This paper proposes an explainable and feature-efficient framework for real-time phishing URL detection. The design combines lexical and structural URL features, four classical machine-learning classifiers, training-fold-only feature selection, SHAP/LIME or intrinsic explanations, and explicit measurement of discrimination, false positives, resource use, and latency. The protocol is designed to reduce data leakage and expose whether compact models generalize beyond a random split. The numerical values retained in Section VIII should be treated as provisional until the dataset, implementation, and evaluation pipeline are executed and independently checked. Final deployment claims should therefore be based on held-out testing, robustness analysis, latency measurements, and reproducibility evidence
[1] S. S. Shafin, “An Explainable Feature Selection Framework for Web Phishing Detection with Machine Learning,” 2024. [2] N. Pundlik, T. Saxena, and J. Mungi, “A Scalable Explainable AI Framework for Phishing Attack Detection with Interpretable Feature Insights with Machine Learning Based Ensemble Models,” 2025. [3] D. R. Patil et al., “Enhanced Phishing URLs Detection using Feature Selection and Machine Learning Approaches,” 2024. [4] R. A. D. Talasari and E. A. Kusnanti, “Phishing URL Detection Using URL Characteristics: A Multi-Algorithm Machine Learning and Explainable AI (XAI) Approach,” 2026. [5] H. K. M. Lai et al., “Explainable Machine Learning Framework for Phishing URL Detection,” 2026. [6] R. Alam et al., “E2Phish: Explainable Ensemble Machine Learning Model for Enhanced Phishing URL Detection,” 2024. [7] M. Alajlouni et al., “Optimizing Phishing URL Detection: A Comparative Analysis of Feature Counts and Training Times,” 2024. [8] L. M. Rani et al., “Feature Selection to Enhance Phishing Website Detection Based On URL Using Machine Learning Techniques,” 2023. [9] M. AbuTaha et al., “URL Phishing Detection using Machine Learning Techniques based on URLs Lexical Analysis,” 2021. [10] B. Banik et al., “Lexical Feature Based Feature Selection and Phishing URL Classification Using Machine Learning Techniques,” 2020. [11] S. Ali et al., “Entropy-Based Feature Selection Classification Approach for Detecting Phishing Websites,” 2019.
Publication Date
10/5/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...