Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67147
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-10
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
FIRE TECHNOLOGY & SAFETY ENGINEERING
VIKRANT UNIVERSITY, GWALIOR
FIRE TECHNOLOGY & SAFETY ENGINEERING
VIKRANT UNIVERSITY, GWALIOR
Fertilizer manufacturing is a complex industrial process involving hazardous chemicals, high-temperature and high-pressure operations, rotating machinery, storage facilities, and potentially toxic or flammable substances. Conventional Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA) methods such as Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP), Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), and risk matrices are valuable for process-safety management but often depend heavily on expert knowledge and periodic assessment. This paper proposes an Intelligent Decision Support System (IDSS) for improving hazard identification and risk assessment in fertilizer industries through the integration of industrial safety knowledge, risk assessment techniques, machine learning, and decision-support mechanisms. The proposed framework collects process, equipment, environmental, and historical incident information; identifies potential hazards; estimates likelihood and severity; classifies risk levels; and recommends appropriate control measures. A hybrid architecture combining rule-based reasoning with machine-learning techniques is proposed to improve interpretability while supporting predictive risk assessment. The system can provide real-time or near-real-time risk information through a user interface and generate prioritized recommendations for safety personnel. The proposed framework is intended to support—not replace—qualified safety professionals and established process-safety procedures. The research provides a foundation for developing an intelligent, explainable, and data-driven approach to industrial risk management in fertilizer manufacturing.
KEYWORDS
This paper proposed an Intelligent Decision Support System for hazard identification and risk assessment in fertilizer industries. The proposed framework integrates conventional safety-analysis techniques, domain knowledge, machine learning, explainable AI, and decision-support functionality. The system is designed to collect heterogeneous industrial safety information, identify potential hazards, estimate risk, prioritize hazardous conditions, explain the factors contributing to the prediction, and provide safety recommendations. The hybrid architecture addresses an important limitation of purely manual or purely data-driven approaches by combining expert knowledge with analytical intelligence. For an M.Tech research project, the proposed framework provides opportunities for significant experimental work in machine learning, explainable AI, database management, risk analytics, and industrial safety. Future implementation and validation using real or appropriately constructed industrial datasets can establish the effectiveness, generalizability, and practical value of the proposed approach.
1. International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC 61882: Hazard and Operability Studies (HAZOP Studies) — Application Guide. 2. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 31000: Risk Management — Guidelines. 3. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 12100: Safety of Machinery — General Principles for Design — Risk Assessment and Risk Reduction. 4. Center for Chemical Process Safety, Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures, AIChE/CCPS. 5. Center for Chemical Process Safety, Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety, AIChE/CCPS. 6. Center for Chemical Process Safety, Layer of Protection Analysis: Simplified Process Risk Assessment, AIChE/CCPS. 7. Sutton, R. S., and Barto, A. G., Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, MIT Press. 8. Breiman, L., “Random Forests,” Machine Learning, vol. 45, pp. 5–32, 2001. 9. Cortes, C., and Vapnik, V., “Support-Vector Networks,” Machine Learning, vol. 20, pp. 273–297, 1995. 10. Lundberg, S. M., and Lee, S.-I., “A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017.
Publication Date
9/8/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
8
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...