Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM63988

Analysing HR Turnover Trends: A Strategic Study on Factors Determining Sustainable Employee Engagement

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM63988

Volume:

10 |

5 |

May 2026

Pages:

1-5

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
Not assigned

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Ponmaheswaran .S

Ponmaheswaran .S

MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION63

RATHINAM TECHNICAL CAMPUS

Download Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Employee engagement is a critical determinant of organizational performance and workforce stability. This study analyzes HR turnover trends and identifies key factors influencing sustainable employee engagement. Drawing on a survey of 55 respondents across entry-level and senior roles, the research examines organizational, job-related, employee-centric, and external factors affecting engagement. Key findings reveal that 54.5% of employees report job satisfaction, 70.9% feel valued at work, and work culture significantly influences engagement (Chi-square = 13.26, p < 0.05). The study concludes with strategic recommendations including enhanced recognition systems, mentorship programs, transparent leadership communication, and career development pathways to reduce turnover and foster long-term organizational commitment.

KEYWORDS

Employee Engagement HR Turnover Sustainable Engagement Workplace Culture Leadership Job Satisfaction Retention

Cite This Article

Ponmaheswaran .S, "Analysing HR Turnover Trends: A Strategic Study on Factors Determining Sustainable Employee Engagement," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1-5, May 2026.

Full Article/Conclusion

This study confirms that sustainable employee engagement is a multifactorial construct shaped by leadership quality, workplace culture, career development structures, recognition systems, and external economic conditions. Among these, workplace culture emerges as the most statistically robust driver of engagement in this sample — organizations with supportive, inclusive cultures are significantly more likely to retain engaged employees.   The predominantly young, entry-level sample profile underscores the need for early-career engagement strategies: structured onboarding, clear role expectations, visible career progression pathways, and meaningful feedback loops. The finding that only 43.6% of respondents intend to stay for two years, and 30.9% have considered leaving, reinforces the urgency of proactive retention investment. The following strategic recommendations emerge from the data: 1.                               Cultivate a Supportive Culture: Invest in inclusive workplace initiatives, team cohesion activities, and transparent communication channels to strengthen the cultural foundation of engagement. 2.                               Develop Structured Career Pathways: Implement mentorship programs, promotion roadmaps, and skills development plans to address the perception gap in career growth. 3.                               Enhance Recognition Frameworks: Even where recognition did not reach statistical significance, introducing structured, frequent, and personalized acknowledgment systems will improve morale and advocacy. 4.                               Strengthen Feedback Mechanisms: Move toward more consistent feedback cadences (weekly or bi-weekly) and ensure employees perceive organizational responsiveness to their input. 5.                               Align Organizational and Personal Goals: Create open dialogue forums and career-planning conversations that help employees see how their personal ambitions connect with organizational objectives.   Future research should investigate post-pandemic hybrid work dynamics, generational differences in engagement drivers, and the emerging role of AI-driven HR analytics in personalizing engagement strategies at scale.  

References

1.                               Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. 2.                               Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (1996). Transformational Leadership. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 3.                               Garcia, M. (2021). Career development and employee retention: Evidence from mid-career professionals. Journal of Human Resources Management, 18(2), 112–128. 4.                               Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268–279. 5.                               Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. 6.                               Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Burnout and engagement: Contributions to a new vision. Burnout Research, 3(4), 16–24. 7.                               Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1102–1121. 8.                               Robinson, D., Perryman, S., & Hayday, S. (2004). The Drivers of Employee Engagement. Institute for Employment Studies, Report 408. 9.                               Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological and Implied Contracts in Organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 8(2), 121–139. 10.                          Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619. 11.                          Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315. 12.                          Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover. Personnel Psychology, 46(2), 259–293. 13.                          Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (1999). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179–201.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

5/25/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

3

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...