Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM63988
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-5
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION63
RATHINAM TECHNICAL CAMPUS
Employee engagement is a critical determinant of organizational performance and workforce stability. This study analyzes HR turnover trends and identifies key factors influencing sustainable employee engagement. Drawing on a survey of 55 respondents across entry-level and senior roles, the research examines organizational, job-related, employee-centric, and external factors affecting engagement. Key findings reveal that 54.5% of employees report job satisfaction, 70.9% feel valued at work, and work culture significantly influences engagement (Chi-square = 13.26, p < 0.05). The study concludes with strategic recommendations including enhanced recognition systems, mentorship programs, transparent leadership communication, and career development pathways to reduce turnover and foster long-term organizational commitment.
KEYWORDS
This study confirms that sustainable employee engagement is a multifactorial construct shaped by leadership quality, workplace culture, career development structures, recognition systems, and external economic conditions. Among these, workplace culture emerges as the most statistically robust driver of engagement in this sample — organizations with supportive, inclusive cultures are significantly more likely to retain engaged employees. The predominantly young, entry-level sample profile underscores the need for early-career engagement strategies: structured onboarding, clear role expectations, visible career progression pathways, and meaningful feedback loops. The finding that only 43.6% of respondents intend to stay for two years, and 30.9% have considered leaving, reinforces the urgency of proactive retention investment. The following strategic recommendations emerge from the data: 1. Cultivate a Supportive Culture: Invest in inclusive workplace initiatives, team cohesion activities, and transparent communication channels to strengthen the cultural foundation of engagement. 2. Develop Structured Career Pathways: Implement mentorship programs, promotion roadmaps, and skills development plans to address the perception gap in career growth. 3. Enhance Recognition Frameworks: Even where recognition did not reach statistical significance, introducing structured, frequent, and personalized acknowledgment systems will improve morale and advocacy. 4. Strengthen Feedback Mechanisms: Move toward more consistent feedback cadences (weekly or bi-weekly) and ensure employees perceive organizational responsiveness to their input. 5. Align Organizational and Personal Goals: Create open dialogue forums and career-planning conversations that help employees see how their personal ambitions connect with organizational objectives. Future research should investigate post-pandemic hybrid work dynamics, generational differences in engagement drivers, and the emerging role of AI-driven HR analytics in personalizing engagement strategies at scale.
1. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. 2. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (1996). Transformational Leadership. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 3. Garcia, M. (2021). Career development and employee retention: Evidence from mid-career professionals. Journal of Human Resources Management, 18(2), 112–128. 4. Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268–279. 5. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. 6. Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Burnout and engagement: Contributions to a new vision. Burnout Research, 3(4), 16–24. 7. Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1102–1121. 8. Robinson, D., Perryman, S., & Hayday, S. (2004). The Drivers of Employee Engagement. Institute for Employment Studies, Report 408. 9. Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological and Implied Contracts in Organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 8(2), 121–139. 10. Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619. 11. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315. 12. Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover. Personnel Psychology, 46(2), 259–293. 13. Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (1999). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179–201.
Publication Date
5/25/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...