Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM12439
Volume:
6 |
4 |
Apr 2022
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The Analysis and Design Comparison of Conventional steel building (CSB) and Pre-engineered building (PEB) with provision of mezzanine floor for a building was done in the work presented. Pre engineered building concept has helped in optimizing design, cost and time. The Pre-engineered building is the best option for basic requirements of construction nowadays like quick developments, economical and high quality for construction. Conventional steel building and Pre-engineered building are design for dead load, live load, wind load and earthquake load. All analysis of forces has been calculated as per is 875 (part 1, part2, and part3) and 1893 for earthquake forces. The design and modelling of 30m in length and 18m in wide building with roofing system has been carried out by using both the concept and the structural design has done in software STAAD Pro Vi8 to analyse the built frame.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/24/2022
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...