Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM65393
Volume:
10 |
6 |
Jun 2026
Pages:
1-10
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Department of Civil Engineering
Shri Venkateshwara University
Department of Civil Engineering
Shri Venkateshwara University, Gajraula (UP)
Department of Civil Engineering
Shri Venkateshwara University, Gajraula (UP)
Department of Civil Engineering
Shri Venkateshwara University, Gajraula (UP)
Department of Civil Engineering
Shri Venkateshwara University, Gajraula (UP)
Structural engineering plays a crucial role in ensuring that buildings are safe, serviceable, durable, and economical. The integration of computer-aided design tools has transformed the way engineers approach structural analysis and design. Among the various software available, STAAD Pro are the most widely used programs for analysing and designing building structures. Each offers unique modelling approaches, analysis techniques, and design capabilities, making a comparative evaluation valuable for engineers and researchers. This study focuses on the design and comparative analysis of a building using STAAD Pro. The primary objective is to examine and compare the structural behaviour, load distribution, member forces, and overall economy of the design obtained from both software. G+4 (Ground plus 4 floors) building is modelled in both platforms, applying identical material properties, loading conditions, and design parameters as per relevant Indian Standards (IS codes). The analysis results are compared in terms of parameters such as bending moments, shear forces, deflections, and reinforcement requirements. The comparative study highlights the differences in analytical accuracy, design output, and software usability. The outcome of this research provides insights into the efficiency and reliability of each software package and assists engineers in selecting the appropriate tool for structural design of buildings.
KEYWORDS
1. By Using STADD Pro., analysis and design of multistorey building is easier and quick process than manual process. 2. Proposed size of the beam and column can be safely used in the structure. 3. The structure is safe in shear bending and deflection. 4. There is no hazardous effect on the structure due to wind load and seismic load on the structure. 5. The structure we taken is stable and structurally defined using various loads and combination. 6. To know the behavior of the structure by applying various loads like dead load, live load, wind load and seismic load by using staad.pro. And also find out the Shear forces, displacement, bending and reactions of structure.
1. Design and Analysis of Residential Building(G+4), Ibrahim, et.al (April 2019). 2. Planning, Analysis and Design of Residential Building(G+5) By using STAAD Pro, Dunnala Lakshmi Anuja, et.al (2019). 3. A Study on Design of Multi-Storey Residential Building, Mr K. Prabin Kumar, et.al (2018). 4. Analysis and Design of a (G+6) Multi-Storey Building Using STAAD Pro, Deevi Krishna Chaitanya, et.al (January, 2017). 5. R. D. Deshpande, et.al (June, 2017): Analysis, Design and Estimation of Basement+G+2 Residential Building. 6. IS 456-2000, Design of RCC elements 7. IS 1893(part 1): 2002 - for earthquake design 8. IS 875 part1 - dead loads 9. IS 875 part2 - live load 10. SP-16.
Publication Date
6/24/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
6
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...