Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM65393

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF G+4 RCC BUILDING USING STAAD PRO

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM65393

Volume:

10 |

6 |

Jun 2026

Pages:

1-10

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM65393

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Biswajit Barik

Biswajit Barik

Department of Civil Engineering

Shri Venkateshwara University

Download Author Certificate
CK

Chitranjan Kumar

Department of Civil Engineering

Shri Venkateshwara University, Gajraula (UP)

Download Co-Author Certificate
AR

Abhishek Rana

Department of Civil Engineering

Shri Venkateshwara University, Gajraula (UP)

Download Co-Author Certificate
PV

Praveen Verma

Department of Civil Engineering

Shri Venkateshwara University, Gajraula (UP)

Download Co-Author Certificate
MC

Mayank Chauhan

Department of Civil Engineering

Shri Venkateshwara University, Gajraula (UP)

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Structural engineering plays a crucial role in ensuring that buildings are safe, serviceable, durable, and economical. The integration of computer-aided design tools has transformed the way engineers approach structural analysis and design. Among the various software available, STAAD Pro are the most widely used programs for analysing and designing building structures. Each offers unique modelling approaches, analysis techniques, and design capabilities, making a comparative evaluation valuable for engineers and researchers. This study focuses on the design and comparative analysis of a building using STAAD Pro. The primary objective is to examine and compare the structural behaviour, load distribution, member forces, and overall economy of the design obtained from both software. G+4 (Ground plus 4 floors) building is modelled in both platforms, applying identical material properties, loading conditions, and design parameters as per relevant Indian Standards (IS codes). The analysis results are compared in terms of parameters such as bending moments, shear forces, deflections, and reinforcement requirements. The comparative study highlights the differences in analytical accuracy, design output, and software usability. The outcome of this research provides insights into the efficiency and reliability of each software package and assists engineers in selecting the appropriate tool for structural design of buildings.

KEYWORDS

Stadd pro design analysis deflection shear force bending moment.

Cite This Article

Biswajit Barik, Chitranjan Kumar, Abhishek Rana, Praveen Verma, Mayank Chauhan, "ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF G+4 RCC BUILDING USING STAAD PRO," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1-10, Jun 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM65393

Full Article/Conclusion

1.   By Using STADD Pro., analysis and design of multistorey building is easier and quick process than manual process. 2.   Proposed size of the beam and column can be safely used in the structure. 3.   The structure is safe in shear bending and deflection. 4.   There is no hazardous effect on the structure due to wind load and seismic load on the structure. 5.   The structure we taken is stable and structurally defined using various loads and combination. 6.   To know the behavior of the structure by applying various loads like dead load, live load, wind load and seismic load by using staad.pro. And also find out the Shear forces, displacement, bending and reactions of structure.

References

1.    Design and Analysis of Residential Building(G+4), Ibrahim, et.al (April 2019). 2.    Planning, Analysis and Design of Residential Building(G+5) By using STAAD Pro, Dunnala Lakshmi Anuja, et.al (2019). 3.    A Study on Design of Multi-Storey Residential Building, Mr K. Prabin Kumar, et.al (2018). 4.    Analysis and Design of a (G+6) Multi-Storey Building Using STAAD Pro, Deevi Krishna Chaitanya, et.al (January, 2017). 5.    R. D. Deshpande, et.al (June, 2017): Analysis, Design and Estimation of Basement+G+2 Residential Building.   6.    IS 456-2000, Design of RCC elements 7.    IS 1893(part 1): 2002 - for earthquake design 8.    IS 875 part1 - dead loads 9.    IS 875 part2 - live load 10.    SP-16.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

6/24/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

1

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

6

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...