Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM13310
Volume:
6 |
5 |
May 2022
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
High-rise buildings are more vulnerable to collapse due to high wind and earthquake pressure. In such a building risk of failure can be minimized by adopting lateral load resisting system. In this study, we compared three lateral load resisting frame i.e. diagrid frame and chevron braced frame with conventional frame system. The seismic analysis is done on these three frames. The structures are analyzed by linear static method. The building is considered to be irregular in plan. For irregular plan, C-shape plan, T-shape plan considered. The results are obtained after analysis are compared by various parameters like storey drift, absolute displacement, base shear, moment and axial forces. The First Comparison is between diagrid system, chevron braced system and conventional frame system for C-Type and T-Plan separately and after that second overall comparison is between C-Plan and T- plan. The analysis is done on by using STAAD Software. The result of work showed that diagrid system resist lateral more efficiently than chevron braced system and conventional frame system as it yields the least value for absolute displacement, storey drift, top storey shear and base shear.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
5/17/2022
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...