Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM41721
Volume:
9 |
2 |
Feb 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This study examines the complex relationship between social media platforms and individual investment decision-making in the contemporary digital financial landscape. Through a comprehensive analysis of 400 retail investors using a stratified random sampling approach, the research investigates how different social media platforms, content formats, and engagement patterns influence investment Behavior, risk perception, and portfolio management decisions. The study employs an integrated theoretical framework combining the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Social Cognitive Theory (SCT), and Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Key findings reveal that while social media plays a significant role in investment information dissemination, its influence is strongly moderated by educational background, platform choice, and investment experience. Notably, LinkedIn emerged as the preferred platform (30%) for investment information, challenging assumptions about video-based content’s dominance. The research also found that higher education levels correlate significantly with increased skepticism toward social media investment advice (r = 0.62, p < 0.01). The findings contribute to behavioral finance literature and offer practical implications for investment platforms, regulators, and individual investors in navigating the intersection of social media and investment decision-making in the digital age.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
2/22/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...