Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67693
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-18
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Bachelor of Business Administration
Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation
Department of Bachelor of Business Administration
Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation
This study examines the influence of UPI (Unified Payments Interface) payment convenience on the impulsive spending behaviour of Generation Z university students in Guntur district, Andhra Pradesh. Using Cochran's (1977) formula for large populations (95% confidence, 5% margin of error), the statistically justified target sample size was calculated at 385; data collection across three rounds yielded 420 raw responses, of which 418 from active UPI users in Guntur district were retained for analysis — exceeding the calculated target (108.6% achievement). Using a descriptive, quantitative research design, a structured questionnaire employing a 5-point Likert scale was administered to students via convenience sampling. Both the Convenience scale (8 items) and the Impulsive Spending scale (7 items) demonstrated good internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90 and 0.89, respectively). Respondents reported moderately high perceived convenience (M = 3.70/5) and moderate impulsive spending tendencies (M = 3.37/5). UPI payment convenience showed a significant, moderate positive relationship with impulsive spending behaviour (r = 0.490, p < .001), explaining approximately 24.0% of the variance. All four convenience sub-dimensions — ease of use, transaction speed, access convenience, and overall convenience — were individually significantly correlated with impulsivity (all p < .001); in a simultaneous multiple regression, ease of use (p = .008) and transaction speed (p = .028) each retained independent significance, while access convenience and overall convenience did not once shared variance was accounted for. UPI usage frequency (ρ = 0.161, p = .001) and cashback/reward sensitivity (F = 27.46, p < .001) were also significantly associated with impulsivity, while gender differences and transaction amount were not significant — consistent with the pattern found in an earlier, smaller subsample, reinforcing that this is a genuine null result rather than a power issue. Findings robustly support the study's central hypothesis and are discussed in relation to the cashless-effect literature, with practical recommendations for students, institutions, and fintech platforms.
KEYWORDS
This study set out to examine whether the convenience of UPI payments influences impulsive spending among Generation Z university students in Guntur district. With a final combined sample of 418 valid responses — exceeding the statistically calculated target of 385 — the evidence strongly and consistently supports that relationship across three independently collected rounds of data. UPI payment convenience is a significant, moderate predictor of impulsive spending, consistent with the broader “cashless effect” literature on digital payments lowering the psychological cost of spending. A refined multiple-regression analysis, possible only at this fuller sample size, indicates that ease of use and transaction speed specifically — more than general accessibility — are what independently drive this effect. Cashback/reward sensitivity and usage frequency also significantly predict impulsivity, while gender and transaction amount do not, with the gender null result now confirmed across two independent larger samples after an unstable pilot-subsample anomaly. Overall, the study delivers a robust, replicated, statistically well-powered answer to its central research question, contributes meaningful regional (non-metro) evidence to a literature concentrated in India's major cities, and identifies specific, actionable directions — particularly around cashback-driven spending and the ease/speed distinction — for students, institutions, and fintech platforms alike.
Auxilia, M., & Gopinath, S. (2023). Impact of UPI on impulsive buying behaviour. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 27(4), 1–6. Berry, L. L., Seiders, K., & Grewal, D. (2002). Understanding service convenience. Journal of Marketing, 66(3), 1–17. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. Colwell, S. R., Aung, M., Kanetkar, V., & Holden, A. L. (2008). Toward a measure of service convenience: Multiple-item scale development and empirical test. Journal of Services Marketing, 22(2), 160–169. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339. Jiang, L. A., Yang, Z., & Jun, M. (2013). Measuring consumer perceptions of online shopping convenience. Journal of Service Management, 24(2), 191–214. Khudeja, S., & Sowmya, D. S. (2025). The success of UPI: A comparative study of Gen Z and millennials. Kumar, R., & Sharma, P. (2023). Digital payment trends and consumer behaviour in India. International Journal of Management Studies. National Payments Corporation of India / Press Information Bureau. (2026). UPI completes 10 glorious years, emerges as world's largest real-time payments platform, anchoring India's digital economy [Press release]. Raghubir, P., & Srivastava, J. (2008). Monopoly money: The effect of payment coupling and form on spending behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14(3), 213–225. Rook, D. W., & Fisher, R. J. (1995). Normative influences on impulsive buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(3), 305–313. Schomburgk, L., Belli, A., & Hoffmann, A. O. I. (2024). Less cash, more splash? A meta-analysis on the cashless effect. Journal of Retailing, 100(3), 382–403.
Publication Date
10/6/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
7
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...