Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM38418
Volume:
8 |
11 |
Nov 2024
Pages:
1-7
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Sociology
Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune
Sociology started studying changes in society which occur after industrial revolution. And development was the major factor in social change at every stage of society. In contemporary world Development becomes predominant in post world war period. ‘Different development agendas reflect different political, economic, social, cultural, ethical, moral and religious goals (Cowan and Shenton, 1996; Power, 2003; Raply, 1996; Desai and Potter, 2006)’. Over the time different sets of thoughts about development have been associated with different philosophies of science and associated epistemologies. In the post community development period ‘development research’ become central theme in social sciences. Every discipline was studying one or many dimensions of development. Broadly speaking early approaches stressed development as economic growth and therefore emphasized quantitative approaches. Later more humanistic approach to development saw the rise of participatory and qualitative lines of investigation. Hence PRA (Participatory Rural Appraisal) become best among participatory methods in social sciences. Present paper focuses on origin and evolution in first part, meaning and definition in second part and technique of PRA in last part. This paper avoids debate on principles of PRA, its classification, types of PRA method, theoretical and conceptual framework due to given limitations.
KEYWORDS
In nutshell PRA can increase local people’s understanding of their problems and opportunities; increase their control over development choices and plans; and initiate a process of community participation that can continue through programme implementation-either in terms of community management of local initiatives, or at least in terms of community monitoring of government schemes. But the important point is that approaches to data collection in development studies remain as diverse as philosophies and theories of development themselves. And this is even more so today, in an era associated with what may be refer to as post structuralism and post modernity the world is significantly more global and more complex than ever before and it is argued that singular theories and conceptualizations are too limiting by far. Meta-theories and metanaratives have been replaced by a multiplicity of conceptualization and approaches. Hence PRA gives opportunity to researchers, police makers, and development activists to bring wide variety of approaches, methods, tools and techniques together.
Alamgir, Mohiuddin (1988). Poverty Alleviation through Participatory Development. Development: Journal of the Society for International Development. 2(3): 97-102 Chambers, R. (1992). Rural appraisal: rapid, relaxed and Participatory, IDS Discussion paper No. 331. Institute of Development Studies, U.K. - (1994). The Origins and Practice of Participatory Rural Appraisal. World Development. 22(7): 953-69. -(1994) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA): Analysis of Experience, Institute of Development Studies, Brighton World Development, Vol. 22, No. 9, pp. 1253-1268 -(1994) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA): Challenges, Potentials and Paradigm, Institute of Development Studies, Brighton World Development, Vol. 22, No. 9, pp. 1253-1268 - (1997) Whose Reality Counts. Intermediate Technology Publications, London - (2004). Notes for Participants in PRA-PLA Familiarisation workshops in 2004. Institute of Development Studies, U.K. Guijt, Irene and Cornwall, Andrea (1995) ‘Critical Reflections on the Practice of PRAs’, Participatory Learning and Action notes 24, IIED: London. IDS. 1996. "The Power of Participation", IDS Policy Briefing Issue #7. August 1996, Institute of Development Studies, U.K.
Publication Date
6/13/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
13
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...