Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67148
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Pharmacology
Omega college of Pharmacy, Edulabad
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly changing the landscape of clinical trials and medication response prediction by allowing for data-driven, efficient, and patient-centered approaches. This study investigates how sophisticated AI techniques such as machine learning, deep learning, and natural language processing can be used to optimise crucial stages of clinical research, such as trial design and patient recruitment, as well as monitoring and outcome analysis. AI-powered methods help identify eligible participants by analysing electronic health records, imaging data, and genomic information, lowering recruiting time and increasing cohort diversity. Furthermore, predictive modelling techniques allow for early detection of adverse events, improve protocol adherence, and assist adaptive trial designs. AI models for medication response prediction use multi-modal datasets such as genomes, proteomics, metabolomics, and clinical factors to reveal complicated biological patterns linked with treatment success and toxicity. These approaches contribute to the development of precision medicine tactics, which enable therapies to be tailored to unique patient profiles. Furthermore, AI-driven biomarker discovery improves the ability to stratify patients and predict treatment outcomes more accurately. Despite its transformative promise, the use of AI in clinical trials confronts significant hurdles, including data heterogeneity, limited interoperability, algorithmic bias, a lack of transparency, and regulatory and ethical issues. Data privacy and compliance with healthcare legislation are significant factors. Emerging solutions, such as explainable AI, federated learning, and standardised validation frameworks, are being developed to address these challenges and boost trust in AI. Overall, incorporating AI into clinical trials and medication response prediction has the potential to shorten drug development timeframes, save costs, increase trial success rates, and improve patient outcomes. Continued research and collaboration across academia, industry, and regulatory agencies will be required to fully realise AI's promise in enhancing personalised and precision healthcare.
KEYWORDS
Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a game-changing tool in clinical research and medication development, providing novel techniques to improve the efficiency, accuracy, and personalisation of therapeutic decision-making. Its applications in clinical trials, such as patient identification and recruitment, eligibility assessment, trial design, data management, safety monitoring, endpoint evaluation, and treatment outcome prediction, have the potential to overcome several limitations of traditional clinical research methods. Specifically, AI-driven analysis of clinical, genetic, imaging, and real-world data can enhance patient classification and identification of factors associated with therapy response. Drug response prediction is one of the most promising AI applications in precision medicine. Machine learning and deep learning techniques can combine various biological and clinical factors to find complex patterns related to therapeutic efficacy, toxicity, resistance, and inter-individual variability.⁴,⁵ These approaches may aid in the selection of relevant patient populations, prediction of treatment results, identification of patients at high risk of adverse events, and optimisation of individualised treatment plans. The combination of AI, pharmacogenomics, multi-omics, and real-world data may aid in the creation of personalised medicinal methods. Despite these potential benefits, various obstacles must be overcome before AI may be widely used in clinical trials and drug development. Data quality and heterogeneity, dataset representativeness, algorithmic bias, interpretability, data privacy, cybersecurity, and external validation challenges can all have an impact on AI model dependability and generalisability.⁹-¹¹ Importantly, excellent performance in retrospective datasets does not always indicate clinical success. Establishing clinical utility requires prospective validation, standardised reporting, transparent model construction, and continuous assessment of model performance.9 As AI-based systems become more integrated into clinical decision-making and medication research, regulatory and ethical concerns will become increasingly essential. Appropriate governance structures are essential to promote openness, accountability, patient safety, data security, and equal performance across populations.¹³,¹⁴ As a result, AI should be seen as a tool to supplement rather than replace clinical skill, pharmaceutical knowledge, or established scientific procedures. Overall, incorporating AI into clinical trials and medication response prediction has enormous potential for improving patient selection, accelerating drug development, improving therapeutic outcome prediction, and enabling more individualised treatment methods. Future research should focus on developing interpretable, reproducible, robust, and clinically validated AI models that can integrate multimodal clinical and biological data. AI has the potential to significantly contribute to a more efficient, safer, and personalised drug development paradigm if validated, regulated, and implemented ethically.10
1. Chen J, Zhang L. A survey and systematic assessment of computational methods for drug response prediction. Briefings in bioinformatics. 2021 Jan;22(1):232-46. 2. Harrer S, Shah P, Antony B, Hu J. Artificial intelligence for clinical trial design. Trends in pharmacological sciences. 2019 Aug 1;40(8):577-91. 3. Garg S, Kitchen R, Gupta R, Pearson E. Applications of AI in predicting drug responses for type 2 diabetes. JMIR diabetes. 2025 Mar 27;10(1):e66831. 4. Turki T, Wang JT. Clinical intelligence: New machine learning techniques for predicting clinical drug response. Computers in biology and medicine. 2019 Apr 1;107:302-22. 5. Ballester PJ, Stevens R, Haibe-Kains B, Huang RS, Aittokallio T. Artificial intelligence for drug response prediction in disease models. Briefings in bioinformatics. 2022 Jan;23(1):bbab450. 6. Prathaban K, Hande MP. Transforming Healthcare: Artificial Intelligence (AI) Applications in Medical Imaging and Drug Response Prediction. Genome Integr. 2025 Jan 22;15:e20240002. doi: 10.14293/genint.15.1.002. PMID: 39845982; PMCID: PMC11752870. 7. Li X, Wu X, Wan X, Zhong F, Cui C, Chen Y, Chen L, Chen K, Jiang H, Zheng M. The application of artificial intelligence to drug sensitivity prediction. Chinese Science Bulletin. 2020;65(32):3551-61. 8. Partin A, Brettin TS, Zhu Y, Narykov O, Clyde A, Overbeek J, Stevens RL. Deep learning methods for drug response prediction in cancer: predominant and emerging trends. Frontiers in medicine. 2023 Feb 15;10:1086097. 9. Vamathevan J, Clark D, Czodrowski P, Dunham I, Ferran E, Lee G, et al. Applications of machine learning in drug discovery and development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18(6):463-477. 10. Harrer S, Shah P, Antony B, Hu J. Artificial intelligence for clinical trial design. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2019;40(8):577-591.
Publication Date
9/8/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...