Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM43745
Volume:
9 |
4 |
Apr 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Sleep disorder classification is crucial in improving human quality of life. Sleep disorders and apnoea can have a significant influence on human health. Sleep-stage classification by experts in the field is an arduous task and is prone to human error. The development of accurate machine learning algorithms (MLAs) for sleep disorder classification requires analysing, monitoring and diagnosing sleep disorders. This paper compares deep learning algorithms and conventional MLAs to classify sleep disorders. This study proposes an optimised method for the Classification of Sleep Disorders and uses the Sleep Health and Lifestyle Dataset publicly available online to evaluate the proposed model. The optimisations were conducted using a genetic algorithm to tune the parameters of different machine learning algorithms. An evaluation and comparison of the proposed algorithm against state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms to classify sleep disorders. The dataset includes 400 rows and 13 columns with various features representing sleep and daily activities. The k-nearest neighbours, support vector machine, decision tree, random forest and artificial neural network (ANN) deep learning algorithms were assessed. The experimental results reveal significant performance differences between the evaluated algorithms. The proposed algorithms obtained a classification accuracy of 83.19%, 92.04%, 88.50%, 91.15% and 92.92%, respectively. The ANN achieved the highest classification accuracy of 92.92%, and its precision, recall and F1-score values on the testing data were 92.01%, 93.80% and 91.93%, respectively. The ANN algorithm achieved higher accuracy than other tested algorithms.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/4/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...