Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM56175
Volume:
10 |
1 |
Jan 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force in drawing and painting, redefining artistic practice and expanding contemporary visual language through data-driven creativity (Manovich, 2019; Paul, 2015). This paper reviews major AI techniques—including neural style transfer (Gatys et al., 2015), generative adversarial networks (GANs) (Goodfellow et al., 2014; Elgammal et al., 2017), diffusion models (Rombach et al., 2022), and transformer-based architectures—and examines their role in image-making, aesthetic production, and visual culture. The study analyzes applications such as AI-assisted drawing, algorithmic painting, creative ideation, art restoration, art education, and commercial visual design (Shanken, 2014; Paul, 2015). It also discusses evaluation approaches that combine computational metrics with human aesthetic judgment (McCormack & d’Inverno, 2012), along with ethical and legal concerns related to authorship, originality, cultural representation, and data ethics (Manovich, 2019). By situating AI-generated art within broader discourses of creativity and artistic agency, this paper highlights the emergence of a hybrid human–AI creative paradigm and outlines future directions for artist-centric and ethically grounded AI art practices.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
1/23/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
7
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...