Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM65084
Volume:
10 |
6 |
Jun 2026
Pages:
1-13
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Resource management and consumer Science
I.C College Of Community Science
Resource management and consumer Science
I.C College Of Community Science
Cleaning work involves repetitive movements, prolonged standing, bending, lifting, and awkward postures, which may increase the risk of musculoskeletal discomfort. The present study was conducted to assess musculoskeletal discomfort among cleaning staff working in colleges of CCS Haryana Agricultural University (CCS HAU), Hisar. A total of 25 cleaning workers were selected for the study. Data were collected using the NIOSH Musculoskeletal Discomfort Survey and analyzed using frequency, percentage, and mean scores. The findings revealed that lower back discomfort was the most commonly reported problem (84%), followed by knee (76%), shoulder (68%), and neck discomfort (60%). Repetitive movements (100%), prolonged standing (92%), and frequent bending (84%) emerged as the major occupational risk factors associated with discomfort. More than half of the respondents experienced symptoms several times a week or daily. Moderate discomfort was reported by 52 percent of the workers, while 28 percent experienced severe discomfort. The highest mean pain score was observed in the lower back (7.2), followed by the knees (6.8) and shoulders (6.3). Musculoskeletal discomfort was found to affect work performance, resulting in increased fatigue, reduced work speed, and difficulty in carrying out routine tasks. The study highlights the high prevalence of musculoskeletal discomfort among cleaning staff and emphasizes the need for ergonomic improvements in the workplace. Provision of ergonomically designed cleaning tools, training on proper working techniques, and adequate rest breaks may help reduce discomfort and improve workers’ health and efficiency.
KEYWORDS
The present study concludes that musculoskeletal discomfort is highly prevalent among cleaning staff working in colleges of CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar. The findings revealed that the lower back, knees, shoulders, and neck were the most affected body regions, with lower back discomfort showing the highest prevalence and severity. Most respondents experienced symptoms frequently, with many reporting discomfort several times per week or daily. The major occupational factors contributing to musculoskeletal discomfort included repetitive movements, prolonged standing, frequent bending, awkward working postures, manual lifting, and insufficient rest breaks. These ergonomic risk factors are inherent in routine cleaning activities such as sweeping, mopping, waste collection, stair cleaning, and carrying cleaning supplies. Musculoskeletal discomfort significantly affected work performance by increasing fatigue, reducing work speed, creating difficulty in performing routine tasks, and lowering productivity. Therefore, cleaning staff represent an occupational group requiring immediate ergonomic attention. It is recommended that institutions introduce ergonomically designed cleaning tools, provide training on proper working postures and safe manual handling techniques, ensure adequate rest breaks, and promote ergonomic awareness among workers. Such interventions can help reduce musculoskeletal discomfort, improve worker health, and enhance overall productivity and job satisfaction.
1. Amarria Dila Sari* , Annisa Rahmadani Anwar, and Muhammad Ragil Suryoputro.2017. Work postural analysis and musculoskeletal injury risk in critical working station at XYZ Ceramics Yogyakarta: Faculty of Industrial Technology, Industrial Engineering, Islamic University of Indonesia, Indonesia, 154, 01083 (2018) ICET4SD 2017 2. Bernard, B. P. (1997). Musculoskeletal Disorders and Workplace Factors. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 3. Bigos SJ, Spengler DM, Martin NA, Zeh J, Fisher L, Nachemson A, Wang MH. Back injuries in industry: A retrospective study. II. Injury factors. Spine. 1986; 11:246–251. [PubMed: 2940708] 4. Da Costa BR, Vieira ER. (2010). Risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 53, 285–323. 5. Davis KG, Heaney CA. The relationship between psychosocial work characteristics and low back pain: Underlying methodological issues. Clinical Biomechanics. 2000; 15:389–406. 6. Davis, K. G., & Heaney, C. A. (2000). The relationship between psychosocial work characteristics and low back pain: Underlying methodological issues. Clinical Biomechanics, 15(6), 389–406. 7. Fit for Work. (2012). Musculoskeletal disorders and the Latvian labour market. The Work Foundation, London. 8. Fit for Work: Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Latvian Labour Market. 2012. The Work Foundation, London. 9. Garg A, Boda S, Moore JS, Kapellusch JM, Bhoyar P, Thiese M, Merryweather A, Deckow-Schaefer G, Bloswick D, Malloy E. The NIOSH lifting equation and low back pain, part 1: Association with low back pain in the BackWorks prospective cohort study. Human Factors. 2013 Advance online publication. 10. Garg, A., Boda, S., Moore, J. S., Kapellusch, J. M., Bhoyar, P., Thiese, M., Merryweather, A., Deckow-Schaefer, G., Bloswick, D., & Malloy, E. (2013). The NIOSH lifting equation and low back pain. Human Factors.
Publication Date
6/16/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...