Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM9344
Volume:
5 |
6 |
Jun 2021
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
In the current educational system, student’s frequent attendance in class is very important for performance evaluation and the quality control. Most institutions still use insecure, time-consuming traditional methods like calling people by the name or having them sign documents. Face recognition technology based on high-definition monitor video and other information technologies is used to solve the problem of the recognizing face for taking attendance. A facial recognition attendance system uses facial technology to automatically record attendance while identifying and verifying a person based on their facial features. This research focusing on a face recognition-based attendance system with getting a less false-positive rate using a threshold to confidence i.e., Euclidean distance value while detecting unknown persons and save their images. Compare to other Euclidean distance-based algorithms like Eigenfaces and Fisher faces, Local Binary Pattern Histogram (LBPH) algorithm is better. We used Haar cascade for face detection because of their robustness and LBPH algorithm for face recognition. It is robust against monotonic grayscale transformations. Scenarios such as face recognition rate, false-positive rate for that and false-positive rate with and without using a threshold in detecting unknown persons are considered to evaluate our system. We got face recognition rate of students is 77% and its false-positive rate is 28%. This system is recognizing students even when students are wearing glasses or grown a beard. Face Recognition of unknown persons is nearly 60% for both with and without applying threshold value. Its false-positive rate is 14% and 30% with and without applying threshold respectively.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
6/22/2023
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...