Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:10.55041/IJSREM26594

Augmenting Classical Strategic Tools with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review of Enhanced Decision-Making Methodologies

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

10.55041/IJSREM26594

Volume:

7 |

11 |

Nov 2023

Pages:

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
Not assigned

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

KHP

Karthik Hosavaranchi Puttaraju

Author Services & Downloads

Full Articles

Abstract

This literature review examines the transformation of established strategic management tools through artificial intelligence (AI) integration, focusing on nine fundamental methodologies: SWOT Analysis, BCG Matrix, Porter’s Five Forces, OKRs, Blue Ocean Strategy, Balanced Scorecard, Hoshin Kanri, Agile Strategies, and Digital Transformation. While these frameworks have proven their value over decades, the emergence of AI technologies presents unprecedented opportunities for enhancement. This review synthesizes current research on how AI capabilities—including machine learning, natural language processing, and predictive analytics—can augment these traditional frameworks to improve their effectiveness and adaptability in the modern business landscape. The analysis reveals several key themes: (1) AI’s potential to process vast amounts of data for more comprehensive environmental scanning in SWOT and Porter’s analyses, (2) the use of predictive modeling to dynamically update BCG Matrix classifications and Blue Ocean opportunities, (3) real-time monitoring and adjustment of OKRs and Balanced Scorecard metrics through AI-driven dashboards, and (4) the integration of AI decision support systems in Hoshin Kanri and Agile methodologies. The review also identifies critical gaps in current research, particularly regarding the ethical implications of AI-enhanced strategic decision-making and the need for human oversight in strategic planning processes, contributing to both academic literature and practical application by providing a structured framework for the understanding of how AI can enhance rather than replace traditional strategic tools while highlighting areas requiring further research and development. The findings suggest that successfully integrating AI into these frameworks requires a balanced approach that leverages technological capabilities while preserving the human-centric aspects of strategic decision-making.

KEYWORDS

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Strategic Management Tools SWOT Analysis BCG Matrix Porter’s Five Forces OKRs (Objectives and Key Results) Blue Ocean Strategy Balanced Scorecard Hoshin Kanri Agile Strategies Digital Transformation Machine Learning Natural Language Processing Predictive Analytics Environmental Scanning Predictive Modeling Real-time Monitoring AI-driven Dashboards Decision Support Systems Ethical Implications Human Oversight Strategic Decision-Making Framework Integration

Cite This Article

Karthik Hosavaranchi Puttaraju, "Augmenting Classical Strategic Tools with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review of Enhanced Decision-Making Methodologies," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 7, no. 11, Nov 2023. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM26594

Full Article/Conclusion

References

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

11/24/2023

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

12

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...