AUGUMENTED REALITY –BASED LEARNING PLAT FORM FOR STEM EDUCATION

The research on an Augmented Reality (AR)–supported learning platform for STEM education shows that the use of modern technologies in education has a positive impact on learning outcomes and student engagement. The results show that AR offers an interactive and immersive environment that enhances the understanding of abstract STEM concepts. Through the use of 3D models and simulations, students can visualise abstract concepts, making it easier to connect theory to practice. This translates into better learning outcomes, retention and comprehension. Moreover, the research underscores the crucial role of student motivation and engagement in learning. The AR platform approach enhances traditional teaching approaches by making the learning process more engaging and interactive, promoting active learning. This enhances student engagement in the learning process and potentially improves their interest in STEM education. Furthermore, the platform facilitates the acquisition of key skills like critical thinking, problem-solving and analytical skills, which are vital for both personal and professional success. However, the research also highlights some challenges associated with the use of AR technology in education. Compatibility issues, infrastructural demands and teacher training can hinder the use of AR. But with ongoing technological developments and institutional backing, these issues can be overcome. The integration of AR with effective teaching strategies is crucial to optimise its use and create a smooth learning experience.

1. Ajit, G. (2021). A systematic review of augmented reality in STEM education. Studies of Applied Economics, 39(6), 1–15. 2. Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 20, 1–11. 3. Alalwan, N., Cheng, L., Al-Samarraie, H., Yousef, R., Ibrahim, R., & Sarsam, S. M. (2020). 4. Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355–385. 5. Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., Graf, S., & Kinshuk. (2014). Augmented reality trends in education: A systematic review of research and applications. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 133–149. 6. Billinghurst, M., Clark, A., & Lee, G. (2015). A survey of augmented reality. Foundations and Trends in Human–Computer Interaction, 8(2–3), 73–272. 7. Cheng, K. H. (2017). Reading an augmented reality book: An exploration of learners’ cognitive load, motivation, and attitudes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 53–69. 8. Garzón, J., Pavón, J., & Baldiris, S. (2019). Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings. Virtual Reality, 23(4), 447–459. 9. Godoy, C. H. (2022). Augmented reality applications in STEM education: A systematic review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.07024. 10. Hsu, Y. S., Lin, Y. H., & Yang, B. (2017). Impact of augmented reality lessons on students’ STEM interest. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 1–14.