Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68425
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Electronics and Communication Engineering
JNTU Gurajada Vizianagaram
Electronics and Communication Engineering
JNTU Gurajada Vizianagaram and AITAM Tekkali
Electronics and Communication Engineering
Chaitanya Bharathi Institute of technology, Hyderabad
Anomaly detection in wireless systems is very vital to guarantee secure and reliable transmission especially in the presence of adversarial users. This paper presents a comparative study of autoencoder-based and subspace projection methods for the detection of anomalous signals in massive MIMO systems. The autoencoder model learns normal signal patterns and detects anomalies by means of reconstruction error, whereas the subspace method uses covariance matrix analysis and eigenvalue decomposition. Simulation results show that the detection probability is increased with the increase of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the number of antennas and the adversary transmit power. The autoencoder-based approach achieves superior performance in nonlinear environments, whereas the subspace method offers computational efficiency and robustness under low-SNR conditions.
KEYWORDS
The proposed anomaly detection method for detecting active eavesdropping attacks in wireless systems based on autoencoder and subspace projection technique. The autoencoder learns the normal patterns of the signal and detects anomalies based on the reconstruction error while the subspace method detects anomalies by measuring the change in the energy of the signal in the noise subspace. The results show that both methods work well in different situations. The subspace method is more robust to noise and performs better at low SNR while the autoencoder can capture more complex signal patterns and performs better at moderate and high SNR. Moreover, the performance of detection is better for more antennas and higher transmit power of the eavesdropper. The proposed method shows good potential for improving security in future wireless systems against active attacks.
[1]. P. Chandra Sekhar and T. S. N. Murthy, “RSMO: Rider Spider Monkey Optimization-Based Artificial Noise Precoding Technique for Physical Layer Security in 5G Networks”, Wireless Personal Communications, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-024-11166-4. [2]. S. Rajasegarar, C. Leckie, and M. Palaniswami, “Anomaly detection in wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 34–40, Aug. 2008. [3]. V. Chandola, A. Banerjee, and V. Kumar, “Anomaly detection: A survey,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 1–58, Jul. 2009. [4]. Y. Zhang, N. Meratnia, and P. Havinga, “Outlier detection techniques for wireless sensor networks: A survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 159–170, 2010. [5]. Y. Li, M. Chen, and W. Dai, “A lightweight anomaly detection approach for wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2017. [6]. N. Shone, T. N. Ngoc, V. D. Phai, and Q. Shi, “A deep learning approach to network intrusion detection,” IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 41–50, Feb. 2018. [7]. T. J. O’Shea and J. Corgan, “Convolutional radio modulation recognition networks,” in Proc. International Conference on Engineering Applications of Neural Networks, 2016. [8]. F. Restuccia, S. D’Oro, and T. Melodia, “Deep learning at the physical layer: System challenges and applications,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 78–87, Oct. 2018. [9]. X. Liu, Y. Liu, and A. Liu, “AI-enabled anomaly detection in IoT systems,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 1–12, 2020. [10]. R. Kumar, P. Singh, and A. K. Verma, “Deep learning-based anomaly detection using CSI in wireless networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 1–12, 2021
Publication Date
10/29/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
8
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...