Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM65833
Volume:
10 |
7 |
Jul 2026
Pages:
1-7
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Faculty of Computing
Guru Kashi, University, Punjab, India
Faculty of Computing
Guru Kashi, University, Punjab, India
Automated Answer Scoring (AAS) this includes both Automated Essay Scoring (AES) and Automated Short Answer Grading/Scoring (ASAG/SAS) has migrated from feature-engineered similarity models to transformer fine-tuning and large language model. A systematic assessment of 50 DOI-having studies that had been published during 2021 to June 2026 across IEEE, ACM, Springer, Wiley, Elsevier, MDPI, BMC, SAGE and related indexed venues is presented in the paper following the PRISMA guidelines. The analysis of benchmark datasets, model families, evaluation metrics, human-machine agreement, feedback generation, fairness, explainability, and deployment malfunctions are synthesized. The study shows that transformer-based models stay strong when benchmark labels are available (for supervised scoring). Meanwhile, LLMs offer flexible zero-shot and few-shot scoring but suffer from instability, rubric (punctuation) sensitivity, domain drift, and fairness issues. Reviews further reveal that the evaluation is dominated by standard datasets such as ASAP, ASAP-SAS, SciEntsBank, Beetle, ASAG2024 and Arabic/medical/domain-specific corpora but under-tested for cross-prompt and multilingual generalization. A high-quality evaluation rubric is designed to assist Q1 level manuscript screening and reproducible future work. The researcher suggests practical research for trustworthy & human supervised AAS systems in the paper.
KEYWORDS
Automated Answer Scoring has entered a new phase in which transformer encoders, sentence embeddings and LLMs coexist rather than replace one another. The most convincing evidence supports supervised transformer and hybrid systems for benchmarked scoring, while LLMs offer strong flexibility for low-resource, multilingual and feedback-rich assessment. However, reliability, fairness, explanation fidelity and domain generalization remain unresolved. Therefore, the best future AAS systems will be neither fully manual nor blindly automatic; they will be auditable human-AI assessment systems that reduce workload while preserving educational validity.
1. Garcia-Varela, F., Lopez, M., & Sanchez, R. (2025). ChatGPT as a stable and fair tool for automated essay scoring. Education Sciences, 15(8), 946. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15080946 2. Gombert, S., Drachsler, H., & Kroehen, U. (2024). From the automated assessment of student essay content to highly informative feedback: A case for trustworthy learning analytics. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00387-6 3. Grevisse, C. (2024). LLM-based automatic short answer grading in undergraduate medical education. BMC Medical Education, 24, 1060. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06026-5 4. Hahn, M. G., Navarro, S. M. B., de la Fuente Valentin, L., & Burgos, D. (2021). A systematic review of the effects of automatic scoring and automatic feedback in educational settings. IEEE https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3100890 5. Kortemeyer, G. (2024). Performance of the pre-trained large language model GPT-4 on automated short answer grading.https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00147-y 6. Li, W., & Liu, H. (2024). Applying large language models for automated essay scoring for non-native Japanese. Humanities and Communications, 11, 723. 7. Ludwig, S., Mayer, C., Hansen, C., Eilers, K., & Brandt, S. (2021). Automated essay scoring using transformer models. Psych, 3(4), 897-915. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych3040056 8. Mardini, G. I. D., Sanuy, J. P., & Prats, M. A. (2024). A deep-learning-based grading system for reading comprehension short answers. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 1769-1798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11890-7 9. Maslim, M., Wang, H. C., Putra, C. D., & Prabowo, Y. D. (2024). A trustworthy automated short-answer scoring system using a new dataset and hybrid transfer learning method. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 8(5), 37-45. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2024.02.003 10. Memarian, B., & Doleck, T. (2024). A review of assessment for learning with artificial intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2, 100040.
Publication Date
7/4/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
25
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...