Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM65833

Automated Answer Scoring in the Transformer and Large Language Model Era: A PRISMA-Guided Systematic Review of Datasets, Methods, Evaluation Metrics, and Trustworthiness (2021-2026)

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM65833

Volume:

10 |

7 |

Jul 2026

Pages:

1-7

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM65833

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

DRK

Dr. Rajinder Kumar

Faculty of Computing

Guru Kashi, University, Punjab, India

Download Author Certificate
SS

Sahil Sharma

Faculty of Computing

Guru Kashi, University, Punjab, India

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Automated Answer Scoring (AAS) this includes both Automated Essay Scoring (AES) and Automated Short Answer Grading/Scoring (ASAG/SAS) has migrated from feature-engineered similarity models to transformer fine-tuning and large language model. A systematic assessment of 50 DOI-having studies that had been published during 2021 to June 2026 across IEEE, ACM, Springer, Wiley, Elsevier, MDPI, BMC, SAGE and related indexed venues is presented in the paper following the PRISMA guidelines. The analysis of benchmark datasets, model families, evaluation metrics, human-machine agreement, feedback generation, fairness, explainability, and deployment malfunctions are synthesized. The study shows that transformer-based models stay strong when benchmark labels are available (for supervised scoring). Meanwhile, LLMs offer flexible zero-shot and few-shot scoring but suffer from instability, rubric (punctuation) sensitivity, domain drift, and fairness issues. Reviews further reveal that the evaluation is dominated by standard datasets such as ASAP, ASAP-SAS, SciEntsBank, Beetle, ASAG2024 and Arabic/medical/domain-specific corpora but under-tested for cross-prompt and multilingual generalization. A high-quality evaluation rubric is designed to assist Q1 level manuscript screening and reproducible future work. The researcher suggests practical research for trustworthy & human supervised AAS systems in the paper.

KEYWORDS

Automated Answer Scoring Automated Essay Scoring Automated Short Answer Grading Large Language Models BERT PRISMA Educational Assessment Explainable AI Fairness Benchmark Datasets.

Cite This Article

Dr. Rajinder Kumar, Sahil Sharma, "Automated Answer Scoring in the Transformer and Large Language Model Era: A PRISMA-Guided Systematic Review of Datasets, Methods, Evaluation Metrics, and Trustworthiness (2021-2026)," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1-7, Jul 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM65833

Full Article/Conclusion

Automated Answer Scoring has entered a new phase in which transformer encoders, sentence embeddings and LLMs coexist rather than replace one another. The most convincing evidence supports supervised transformer and hybrid systems for benchmarked scoring, while LLMs offer strong flexibility for low-resource, multilingual and feedback-rich assessment. However, reliability, fairness, explanation fidelity and domain generalization remain unresolved. Therefore, the best future AAS systems will be neither fully manual nor blindly automatic; they will be auditable human-AI assessment systems that reduce workload while preserving educational validity.

References

1.       Garcia-Varela, F., Lopez, M., & Sanchez, R. (2025). ChatGPT as a stable and fair tool for automated essay scoring. Education Sciences, 15(8), 946. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15080946 2.   Gombert, S., Drachsler, H., & Kroehen, U. (2024). From the automated assessment of student essay content to highly informative feedback: A case for trustworthy learning analytics. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00387-6 3.   Grevisse, C. (2024). LLM-based automatic short answer grading in undergraduate medical education. BMC Medical Education, 24, 1060. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06026-5 4.   Hahn, M. G., Navarro, S. M. B., de la Fuente Valentin, L., & Burgos, D. (2021). A systematic review of the effects of automatic scoring and automatic feedback in educational settings. IEEE https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3100890 5.   Kortemeyer, G. (2024). Performance of the pre-trained large language model GPT-4 on automated short answer grading.https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00147-y 6.   Li, W., & Liu, H. (2024). Applying large language models for automated essay scoring for non-native Japanese. Humanities and Communications, 11,    723. 7.    Ludwig, S., Mayer, C., Hansen, C., Eilers, K., & Brandt, S. (2021). Automated essay scoring using transformer models. Psych, 3(4), 897-915. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych3040056 8.      Mardini, G. I. D., Sanuy, J. P., & Prats, M. A. (2024). A deep-learning-based grading system for reading comprehension short answers. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 1769-1798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11890-7 9.   Maslim, M., Wang, H. C., Putra, C. D., & Prabowo, Y. D. (2024). A trustworthy automated short-answer scoring system using a new dataset and hybrid transfer learning method. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 8(5), 37-45. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2024.02.003 10.     Memarian, B., & Doleck, T. (2024). A review of assessment for learning with artificial intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior:              Artificial             Humans, 2,             100040.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

7/4/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

1

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

25

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...